Michigan Medicine

3.8M citations
82.4k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Michigan Medicine

79k papers receiving 3.8M citations

Peers

Michigan Medicine
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 286.2k
  • Oncology 199.1k
  • Molecular Biology 547.4k
  • Immunology 166.5k
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 191.9k
Replace Cleveland Clinic with:
Cleveland Clinic United States
Indiana University School of Medicine
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center United States
Indiana University Indianapolis United States
University of Rochester Medicine United States
Hospital for Sick Children Canada
University Health Network Canada
Medical College of Wisconsin United States
Vanderbilt University Medical Center United States
Duke Medical Center United States
Michigan Medicine relative to Cleveland Clinic United States Cleveland Clinic's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Cleveland Clinic · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Michigan Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Michigan Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Michigan Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michigan Medicine more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Michigan Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Michigan Medicine at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Michigan Medicine at the time of their publication.

About Michigan Medicine

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Michigan Medicine have published 82.4k papers, which have received a total of 3.8M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 6.5k papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 8.9k papers in Surgery, 4.7k papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 5.4k papers in Epidemiology and 513 papers in Internal Medicine on the topics of Innovations in Medical Education (1.2k papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (746 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (651 papers), Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (630 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (623 papers), Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (618 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (603 papers) and Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (564 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (286.2k citations), Oncology (199.1k citations), Molecular Biology (547.4k citations), Immunology (166.5k citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (191.9k citations). Authors at Michigan Medicine collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Biological Chemistry, The Journal of Immunology, PLoS ONE, Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery and The Journal of Urology. Some of Michigan Medicine's most productive authors include Randal J. Kaufman, Gabriel Núñez, Peter A. Ward, Steven L. Kunkel, Anna Suk-Fong Lok, Kevin C. Chung, Arul M. Chinnaiyan, Alan R. Saltiel, Vishva M. Dixit and Bertram Pitt.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact