University of Mary Hardin–Baylor

7.2k citations
350 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

University of Mary Hardin–Baylor

296 papers receiving 6.4k citations

Peers

University of Mary Hardin–Baylor
Comparison fields: 5 of 217
  • Cell Biology 2.3k
  • Rehabilitation 755
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 752
  • Physiology 1.7k
  • Research and Theory 38
Replace Texas Wesleyan University with:
Texas Wesleyan University United States
Cooper Clinic United States
University of Arkansas – Fort Smith United States
Cleveland University United States
Star Center United States
National University of Health Sciences United States
Rockhurst University United States
Virginia College United States
Maryville University United States
Avila University United States
University of Mary Hardin–Baylor relative to Texas Wesleyan University United States Texas Wesleyan University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×31.9×
Texas Wesleyan University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of Mary Hardin–Baylor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Mary Hardin–Baylor. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Mary Hardin–Baylor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Mary Hardin–Baylor more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of Mary Hardin–Baylor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Mary Hardin–Baylor at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Mary Hardin–Baylor at the time of their publication.

About University of Mary Hardin–Baylor

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Mary Hardin–Baylor have published 350 papers, which have received a total of 7.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 64 papers in Cell Biology, 29 papers in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, 2 papers in Research and Theory, 13 papers in Rehabilitation and 43 papers in Physiology on the topics of Muscle metabolism and nutrition (61 papers), Sports Performance and Training (27 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (17 papers), Exercise and Physiological Responses (13 papers), Coffee research and impacts (12 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (12 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (9 papers) and Muscle Physiology and Disorders (8 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Cell Biology (2.3k citations), Rehabilitation (755 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (752 citations), Physiology (1.7k citations) and Research and Theory (38 citations). Authors at University of Mary Hardin–Baylor collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, Nutrients, The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, Strength and conditioning journal and The FASEB Journal. Some of University of Mary Hardin–Baylor's most productive authors include Colin Wilborn, Richard B. Kreider, Lem Taylor, José António, Bill Campbell, Abbie E. Smith‐Ryan, Darryn S. Willoughby, Chad M. Kerksick, Tim N. Ziegenfuss and Robert Wildman.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact