Umkhuseli Innovation and Research Management

40.8k citations
2.4k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Umkhuseli Innovation and Research Management

2.0k papers receiving 37.5k citations

Peers

Umkhuseli Innovation and Research Management
Comparison fields: 5 of 242
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 5.0k
  • Archeology 334
  • Ecology 6.6k
  • Ecological Modeling 1.1k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 4.3k
Replace University of Fort Hare with:
University of Fort Hare South Africa
University of Zululand South Africa
Eduardo Mondlane University Mozambique
University of Venda South Africa
National Research Foundation South Africa
Scientific Services South Africa
Port Elizabeth Provincial Hospital South Africa
University of Eswatini Eswatini
National University of Lesotho Lesotho
University of Namibia Namibia
Umkhuseli Innovation and Research Management relative to University of Fort Hare South Africa University of Fort Hare's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
University of Fort Hare · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Umkhuseli Innovation and Research Management

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Umkhuseli Innovation and Research Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Umkhuseli Innovation and Research Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Umkhuseli Innovation and Research Management more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Umkhuseli Innovation and Research Management

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Umkhuseli Innovation and Research Management at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Umkhuseli Innovation and Research Management at the time of their publication.

About Umkhuseli Innovation and Research Management

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Umkhuseli Innovation and Research Management have published 2.4k papers, which have received a total of 40.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 24 papers in Archeology, 258 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 261 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 52 papers in Forestry and 117 papers in Soil Science on the topics of Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (112 papers), Forest ecology and management (103 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (77 papers), Plant and animal studies (58 papers), Diptera species taxonomy and behavior (50 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (49 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (44 papers) and Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (43 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (5.0k citations), Archeology (334 citations), Ecology (6.6k citations), Ecological Modeling (1.1k citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (4.3k citations). Authors at Umkhuseli Innovation and Research Management collaborate with scholars in South Africa, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Water SA, Development Southern Africa, Annals of Botany, Scientific Reports and South African Journal of Science. Some of Umkhuseli Innovation and Research Management's most productive authors include Mike Coke, Marlize Lombard, Katharine Vincent, Tonia Rabe, A. P.G. Schönau, Anna K. Jäger, Allan H. Wilson, Absalom El-Shamir Ezugwu, H. H. B. MORRIS and Peter Styan Goodman.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact