Universidade Federal do Acre

35.6k citations
3.8k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Universidade Federal do Acre

3.0k papers receiving 33.4k citations

Peers

Universidade Federal do Acre
Comparison fields: 5 of 240
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 5.3k
  • Forestry 1.4k
  • Global and Planetary Change 7.3k
  • Paleontology 1.9k
  • Ecological Modeling 1.0k
Replace Universidade Federal de Rondônia with:
Universidade Federal de Rondônia Brazil
Universidad Mayor de San Andrés Bolivia
Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina Peru
Universidade Federal do Amazonas Brazil
Universidade do Estado do Amazonas Brazil
Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso Brazil
Universidad San Pedro Peru
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso Brazil
Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja Ecuador
Universidade Federal do Oeste do Pará Brazil
Universidade Federal do Acre relative to Universidade Federal de Rondônia Brazil Universidade Federal de Rondônia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.5×
Universidade Federal de Rondônia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Universidade Federal do Acre

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Universidade Federal do Acre. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Universidade Federal do Acre with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Universidade Federal do Acre more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Universidade Federal do Acre

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Universidade Federal do Acre at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Universidade Federal do Acre at the time of their publication.

About Universidade Federal do Acre

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Universidade Federal do Acre have published 3.8k papers, which have received a total of 35.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 279 papers in Forestry, 391 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 195 papers in Soil Science, 688 papers in Plant Science and 198 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law on the topics of Growth and nutrition in plants (275 papers), Agricultural and Food Sciences (234 papers), Fish biology, ecology, and behavior (184 papers), Plant and animal studies (162 papers), Soil Management and Crop Yield (161 papers), Education Pedagogy and Practices (144 papers), Rural Development and Agriculture (115 papers) and Banana Cultivation and Research (111 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (5.3k citations), Forestry (1.4k citations), Global and Planetary Change (7.3k citations), Paleontology (1.9k citations) and Ecological Modeling (1.0k citations). Authors at Universidade Federal do Acre collaborate with scholars in Brazil, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including ZooKeys, Forest Ecology and Management, Ciência e Agrotecnologia, PLoS ONE and Cadernos de Saúde Pública. Some of Universidade Federal do Acre's most productive authors include Paulo Sérgio Bernarde, Elder Ferreira Morato, Francisco Ricardo Negri, CARLOS AFONSO NOBRE, Foster Brown, Marcelo Urbano Ferreira, Alceu Ranzi, L. H. de O. Wadt, Júlio César Bicca‐Marques and Douglas Riff.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact