The London College

185.1k citations
5.1k papers ·

Impact in

    • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
    • Neural dynamics and brain function
    • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
    • Visual perception and processing mechanisms

Papers in

The London College

4.2k papers receiving 163.2k citations

Peers

The London College
Comparison fields: 5 of 251
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 16.9k
  • Clinical Psychology 10.2k
  • Developmental Neuroscience 1.8k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 5.9k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 5.6k
Replace University of Portsmouth with:
University of Portsmouth United Kingdom
Science Oxford United Kingdom
Université de Caen Normandie France
De Montfort University United Kingdom
At Bristol United Kingdom
Institut Universitaire de France France
University of Hertfordshire United Kingdom
Dartmouth Hospital United Kingdom
University of Applied Sciences Leiden Netherlands
Nottingham Trent University United Kingdom
The London College relative to University of Portsmouth United Kingdom University of Portsmouth's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
University of Portsmouth · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at The London College

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at The London College. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at The London College with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The London College more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at The London College

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with The London College at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with The London College at the time of their publication.

About The London College

In recent decades, authors affiliated with The London College have published 5.1k papers, which have received a total of 185.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 324 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 67 papers in Pharmaceutical Science, 142 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 33 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology and 17 papers in Family Practice on the topics of Neural dynamics and brain function (68 papers), Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (57 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (56 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (53 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (49 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (42 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (35 papers) and Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (35 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Cognitive Neuroscience (16.9k citations), Clinical Psychology (10.2k citations), Developmental Neuroscience (1.8k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (5.9k citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (5.6k citations). Authors at The London College collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including International Journal of Pharmaceutics, Scientific Reports, Nature Communications, PLoS ONE and Clinical Medicine. Some of The London College's most productive authors include A.K. Jonscher, Paul C. Beard, Rasmus O. Nielsen, Adrian F Furnham, Abdul W. Basit, Chris R. Brewin, Ziheng Yang, JAMES M. LEIPER, Nilli Lavie and Simon Gaisford.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact