Universidade Católica Dom Bosco

1.9k papers receiving 27.1k citations

Peers

Universidade Católica Dom Bosco
Comparison fields: 5 of 231
  • Microbiology 4.3k
  • Parasitology 1.1k
  • Plant Science 3.9k
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 986
  • Molecular Medicine 524
Replace Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados with:
Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados Brazil
Universidade Católica de Brasília Brazil
Universidade Paranaense Brazil
Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste Brazil
Universidade Luterana do Brasil Brazil
Universidade Paulista Brazil
Universidade do Oeste Paulista Brazil
Ministry of Education Brazil
Universidade Norte do Paraná Brazil
Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre Brazil
Universidade Católica Dom Bosco relative to Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados Brazil Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.6×
Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Universidade Católica Dom Bosco

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Universidade Católica Dom Bosco. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Universidade Católica Dom Bosco with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Universidade Católica Dom Bosco more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Universidade Católica Dom Bosco

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Universidade Católica Dom Bosco at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Universidade Católica Dom Bosco at the time of their publication.

About Universidade Católica Dom Bosco

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Universidade Católica Dom Bosco have published 2.2k papers, which have received a total of 27.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 181 papers in Microbiology, 25 papers in General Psychology, 102 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science, 62 papers in Parasitology and 85 papers in Cultural Studies on the topics of Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities (175 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (79 papers), Education Pedagogy and Practices (53 papers), Indigenous Cultures and Socio-Education (52 papers), Smart Agriculture and AI (48 papers), Migration, Education, Indigenous Social Dynamics (44 papers), Vector-borne infectious diseases (44 papers) and Indigenous Cultures and History (31 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Microbiology (4.3k citations), Parasitology (1.1k citations), Plant Science (3.9k citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (986 citations) and Molecular Medicine (524 citations). Authors at Universidade Católica Dom Bosco collaborate with scholars in Brazil, United States and Portugal and have published in prestigious journals including Scientific Reports, Frontiers in Microbiology, Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária/Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Parasitology, PLoS ONE and Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. Some of Universidade Católica Dom Bosco's most productive authors include Octávio Luiz Franco, Hemerson Pistori, Marlon Henrique e Silva Cardoso, César de la Fuente‐Núñez, William Farias Porto, Simoni Campos Dias, Robert E. W. Hancock, Ludovico Migliolo, Osmar Nascimento Silva and Heitor Miraglia Herrera.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact