Universidade Católica Dom Bosco

26.6k citations
2.3k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities 177
    • Agricultural and Food Sciences 77

Universidade Católica Dom Bosco

1.8k papers receiving 24.9k citations

Peers

Universidade Católica Dom Bosco
Comparison fields: 5 of 236
  • Microbiology 4.4k
  • Parasitology 1.3k
  • Molecular Medicine 681
  • Forestry 558
  • Plant Science 4.4k
Replace Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados with:
Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados Brazil
Universidade Católica de Brasília Brazil
Universidade de Sorocaba Brazil
Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto Brazil
Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste Brazil
Clinics Hospital of Ribeirão Preto Brazil
Universidade Paranaense Brazil
Universidade do Oeste Paulista Brazil
Universidade Paulista Brazil
Instituto Biológico Brazil
Universidade Católica Dom Bosco relative to Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados Brazil Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.7×
Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Universidade Católica Dom Bosco

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Universidade Católica Dom Bosco. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Universidade Católica Dom Bosco with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Universidade Católica Dom Bosco more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Universidade Católica Dom Bosco

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Universidade Católica Dom Bosco at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Universidade Católica Dom Bosco at the time of their publication.

About Universidade Católica Dom Bosco

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Universidade Católica Dom Bosco have published 2.3k papers, which have received a total of 26.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 182 papers in Microbiology, 103 papers in Forestry, 96 papers in Parasitology, 52 papers in Occupational Therapy and 16 papers in General Psychology on the topics of Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities (177 papers), Education Pedagogy and Practices (114 papers), Biochemical and Structural Characterization (93 papers), Business and Management Studies (80 papers), Agricultural and Food Sciences (77 papers), Youth, Drugs, and Violence (74 papers), Rural Development and Agriculture (72 papers) and Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (71 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Microbiology (4.4k citations), Parasitology (1.3k citations), Molecular Medicine (681 citations), Forestry (558 citations) and Plant Science (4.4k citations). Authors at Universidade Católica Dom Bosco collaborate with scholars in Brazil, United States and Portugal and have published in prestigious journals including Frontiers in Microbiology, Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária/Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Parasitology, Scientific Reports, PLoS ONE and Tellus A Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography. Some of Universidade Católica Dom Bosco's most productive authors include Octávio Luiz Franco, Hemerson Pistori, Marlon H. Cardoso, César de la Fuente‐Núñez, William F. Porto, Simoni Campos Dias, Robert E. W. Hancock, Ludovico Migliolo, Osmar Nascimento Silva and Heitor Miraglia Herrera.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact