Universidad Católica Andrés Bello

403 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Universidad Católica Andrés Bello
Comparison fields: 5 of 209
  • Computer Science Applications 129
  • Communication 134
  • Health Informatics 24
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 133
  • Information Systems and Management 72
Replace National Experimental University of the Armed Forces with:
National Experimental University of the Armed Forces Venezuela
University of La Guajira Colombia
Politécnico Grancolombiano Colombia
InterAmerican University of Puerto Rico Puerto Rico
American Military Academy Puerto Rico
Antioquia Institute of Technology Colombia
Universidad Bicentenaria de Aragua Venezuela
Popular University of Cesar Colombia
Universidad Pedagógica Nacional Colombia
University of Boyaca Colombia
Universidad Católica Andrés Bello relative to National Experimental University of the Armed Forces Venezuela National Experimental University of the Armed Forces's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×
National Experimental University of the Armed Forces · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Universidad Católica Andrés Bello

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Universidad Católica Andrés Bello. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Universidad Católica Andrés Bello with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Universidad Católica Andrés Bello more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Universidad Católica Andrés Bello

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Universidad Católica Andrés Bello at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Universidad Católica Andrés Bello at the time of their publication.

About Universidad Católica Andrés Bello

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Universidad Católica Andrés Bello have published 642 papers, which have received a total of 2.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 36 papers in Linguistics and Language, 26 papers in Computer Science Applications, 32 papers in Communication, 14 papers in General Social Sciences and 48 papers in Demography on the topics of Cultural and political discourse analysis (35 papers), Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies (34 papers), Business, Innovation, and Economy (31 papers), Educational Innovations and Technology (30 papers), History and Politics in Latin America (24 papers), Criminal Justice and Penology (23 papers), Agricultural and Food Production Studies (22 papers) and Historical Studies in Latin America (22 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Computer Science Applications (129 citations), Communication (134 citations), Health Informatics (24 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (133 citations) and Information Systems and Management (72 citations). Authors at Universidad Católica Andrés Bello collaborate with scholars in Venezuela, Spain and Ecuador and have published in prestigious journals including The Journal of World Intellectual Property, Estudios constitucionales, El Profesional de la Informacion, Cadernos de Saúde Pública and Crime Law and Social Change. Some of Universidad Católica Andrés Bello's most productive authors include Isabelle Anguelovski, James J. Connolly, Anna Livia Brand, C. Riverol, Silvana Dakduk, Amaia Méndez Zorrilla, Ibon Ruiz, José E. Burgos, Pilar Fernández Hernando and Rosa Marı́a Garcinuño Martı́nez.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact