Tonbridge School

185 papers receiving 3.8k citations

Peers

Tonbridge School
Comparison fields: 5 of 223
  • Equine 148
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 741
  • Biophysics 223
  • Theoretical Computer Science 35
  • Analytical Chemistry 252
Replace Biomedical Informatics Research Center Antwerp with:
Biomedical Informatics Research Center Antwerp Belgium
Quotient Clinical (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
Oaks Hospital United Kingdom
Oxford Research (Norway) Norway
Seevic College United Kingdom
Museums Northumberland United States
Bundesministerium für Forschung, Technologie und Raumfahrt Germany
Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow United Kingdom
Catholic University College of Bruges–Ostend Belgium
Boiron (France) France
Tonbridge School relative to Biomedical Informatics Research Center Antwerp Belgium Biomedical Informatics Research Center Antwerp's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×21.1×
Biomedical Informatics Research Center Antwerp · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Tonbridge School

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Tonbridge School. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Tonbridge School with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tonbridge School more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Tonbridge School

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Tonbridge School at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Tonbridge School at the time of their publication.

About Tonbridge School

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Tonbridge School have published 287 papers, which have received a total of 4.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 43 papers in Theoretical Computer Science, 52 papers in Geometry and Topology, 7 papers in Equine, 19 papers in Algebra and Number Theory and 10 papers in Small Animals on the topics of Mathematics and Applications (50 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (43 papers), Analytic Number Theory Research (16 papers), Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing (9 papers), Veterinary Equine Medical Research (7 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (7 papers), Advanced Mathematical Theories and Applications (6 papers) and Advanced Mathematical Theories (6 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Equine (148 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (741 citations), Biophysics (223 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (35 citations) and Analytical Chemistry (252 citations). Authors at Tonbridge School collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands and have published in prestigious journals including Equine Veterinary Journal, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, Contact Lens and Anterior Eye and Annals of Neurology. Some of Tonbridge School's most productive authors include Richard J. A. Buggs, Alan Knowles, Simon Shorvon, Josemir W. Sander, Bridget MacDonald, Janine Bestall, David Armstrong, A J Howitt, Margarita Osadchy and Lorna Ashton.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact