Thomas University

689 papers receiving 22.9k citations

Peers

Thomas University
Comparison fields: 5 of 237
  • Marketing 2.2k
  • Information Systems and Management 1.4k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 1.5k
  • Business and International Management 293
  • Applied Psychology 647
Replace University of South Florida Sarasota–Manatee with:
University of South Florida Sarasota–Manatee United States
Stetson University United States
Columbia College - South Carolina United States
University of Mobile United States
Jones College United States
Clayton State University United States
University of South Carolina Aiken United States
Jacksonville State University United States
Nicholls State University United States
Belmont University United States
Thomas University relative to University of South Florida Sarasota–Manatee United States University of South Florida Sarasota–Manatee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
University of South Florida Sarasota–Manatee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Thomas University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Thomas University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Thomas University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Thomas University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Thomas University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Thomas University at the time of their publication.

About Thomas University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Thomas University have published 892 papers, which have received a total of 24.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 8 papers in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, 18 papers in Public Administration, 162 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 68 papers in Clinical Psychology and 32 papers in Gender Studies on the topics of Canadian Identity and History (21 papers), Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (16 papers), Identity, Memory, and Therapy (15 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (12 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (10 papers), Law, Rights, and Freedoms (10 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (10 papers) and Social Work Education and Practice (10 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Marketing (2.2k citations), Information Systems and Management (1.4k citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (1.5k citations), Business and International Management (293 citations) and Applied Psychology (647 citations). Authors at Thomas University collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement, Hispanic American Historical Review, Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition and The Journal of Popular Culture. Some of Thomas University's most productive authors include Geoffrey S. Hubona, Jörg Henseler, Doug McKenzie‐Mohr, Mark David Rose, Joseph P. Vogel, Sabina Signoretti, Arnold J. Levine, Annie Thomas, John M. Dutton and Thomas G. Chappell.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact