Taylor University

338 papers receiving 4.8k citations

Peers

Taylor University
Comparison fields: 5 of 209
  • Ecological Modeling 56
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 440
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 271
  • Computer Science Applications 82
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 127
Replace Manchester University with:
Manchester University United States
Sweet Briar College United States
Cornell College United States
Washington and Jefferson College United States
Carthage College United States
Millikin University United States
California University of Pennsylvania United States
Edgewood University United States
Loras College United States
Clarion University United States
Taylor University relative to Manchester University United States Manchester University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.3×
Manchester University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Taylor University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Taylor University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Taylor University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Taylor University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Taylor University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Taylor University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Taylor University at the time of their publication.

About Taylor University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Taylor University have published 371 papers, which have received a total of 4.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 17 papers in Computer Science Applications, 19 papers in Religious studies, 13 papers in Health, 47 papers in Education and 6 papers in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation on the topics of Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (17 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (17 papers), Contemporary Christian Leadership and Education (11 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (11 papers), Spacecraft Design and Technology (10 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (9 papers), Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (8 papers) and Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (8 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (56 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (440 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (271 citations), Computer Science Applications (82 citations) and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (127 citations). Authors at Taylor University collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and Malaysia and have published in prestigious journals including Christian Higher Education, International journal of exercise science, Geophysical Research Letters, Vaccine and The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. Some of Taylor University's most productive authors include Matthew P. Harber, Adam R. Konopka, Paul E. Rothrock, Ken Kiers A, Andrew L. Hipp, Hank D. Voss, Jiancheng Shen, Nicholas L. Babin, Thomas W. Gardner and Anton A. Reznicek.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact