Uniwersytet SWPS

60k citations
4.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Uniwersytet SWPS

3.5k papers receiving 60k citations

Peers

Uniwersytet SWPS
Comparison fields: 5 of 219
  • Applied Psychology 4.2k
  • Clinical Psychology 10k
  • General Decision Sciences 1.3k
  • Social Psychology 8.8k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 5.9k
Replace National Institute of Mental Health with:
National Institute of Mental Health Czechia
University of Bamberg Germany
John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin Poland
University of Erfurt Germany
Central European University Austria
Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences Germany
German Institute for Economic Research Germany
University of Koblenz and Landau Germany
University of Gävle Sweden
OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University Norway
Uniwersytet SWPS relative to National Institute of Mental Health Czechia National Institute of Mental Health's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11.6×
National Institute of Mental Health · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Uniwersytet SWPS

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Uniwersytet SWPS. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Uniwersytet SWPS with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Uniwersytet SWPS more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Uniwersytet SWPS

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Uniwersytet SWPS at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Uniwersytet SWPS at the time of their publication.

About Uniwersytet SWPS

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Uniwersytet SWPS have published 4.1k papers, which have received a total of 60k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 218 papers in Applied Psychology, 122 papers in General Decision Sciences, 601 papers in Social Psychology, 594 papers in Clinical Psychology and 409 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience on the topics of Social and Intergroup Psychology (198 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (136 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (122 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (112 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (99 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (80 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (74 papers) and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (73 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Applied Psychology (4.2k citations), Clinical Psychology (10k citations), General Decision Sciences (1.3k citations), Social Psychology (8.8k citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (5.9k citations). Authors at Uniwersytet SWPS collaborate with scholars in Poland, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Frontiers in Psychology, PLoS ONE, Personality and Individual Differences, Scientific Reports and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. Some of Uniwersytet SWPS's most productive authors include Aleksandra Łuszczyńska, Ralf Schwarzer, John B. Nezlek, Bogdan Wojciszke, Agnieszka Golec de Zavala, Andrea E. Abele, Nina Knoll, Dariusz Doliński, Izabela Krejtz and Daniel Boduszek.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact