Silicon Valley Community Foundation

10.9k citations
288 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Silicon Valley Community Foundation

268 papers receiving 10.7k citations

Peers

Silicon Valley Community Foundation
Comparison fields: 5 of 195
  • Human-Computer Interaction 866
  • Computer Networks and Communications 3.1k
  • Artificial Intelligence 3.5k
  • Media Technology 918
  • Information Systems 2.0k
Replace Snap (United States) with:
Snap (United States) United States
Machine Intelligence Research Institute United States
NortonLifeLock (United States) United States
Lotus Clinical Research United States
Xenobe Research Institute United States
USC Institute for Creative Technologies United States
Adaptive Cognitive Systems United States
IDEO (United States) United States
UtopiaCompression (United States) United States
DigitalSpace (United States) United States
Silicon Valley Community Foundation relative to Snap (United States) United States Snap (United States)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
Snap (United States) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Silicon Valley Community Foundation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Silicon Valley Community Foundation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Silicon Valley Community Foundation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Silicon Valley Community Foundation more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Silicon Valley Community Foundation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Silicon Valley Community Foundation at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Silicon Valley Community Foundation at the time of their publication.

About Silicon Valley Community Foundation

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Silicon Valley Community Foundation have published 288 papers, which have received a total of 10.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 91 papers in Computer Networks and Communications, 10 papers in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, 83 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 41 papers in Computational Theory and Mathematics and 31 papers in Management Science and Operations Research on the topics of Distributed systems and fault tolerance (28 papers), Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs (28 papers), Cryptography and Data Security (20 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (18 papers), Optimization and Search Problems (16 papers), Advanced Data Storage Technologies (16 papers), Foot and Ankle Surgery (15 papers) and Advanced Graph Theory Research (14 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Human-Computer Interaction (866 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (3.1k citations), Artificial Intelligence (3.5k citations), Media Technology (918 citations) and Information Systems (2.0k citations). Authors at Silicon Valley Community Foundation collaborate with scholars in United States, China and Israel and have published in prestigious journals including The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery, Communications of the ACM, Distributed Computing, Journal of the ACM and IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems. Some of Silicon Valley Community Foundation's most productive authors include Cynthia Dwork, Kurt Akeley, Ahna R. Girshick, Martin S. Banks, David M. Hoffman, Wei Chen, Yifei Yuan, Li Zhang, Michael Isard and Sergey Yekhanin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact