USC Institute for Creative Technologies

10.8k citations
331 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

USC Institute for Creative Technologies

307 papers receiving 10.4k citations

Peers

USC Institute for Creative Technologies
Comparison fields: 5 of 180
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 2.0k
  • Human-Computer Interaction 1.6k
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 5.6k
  • Computational Mechanics 2.1k
  • Applied Psychology 371
Replace Snap (United States) with:
Snap (United States) United States
PATH To Reading United States
Virtual Reality Medical Center United States
Lotus Clinical Research United States
Silicon Valley Community Foundation United States
Xenobe Research Institute United States
Machine Intelligence Research Institute United States
Salesforce (United States) United States
IDEO (United States) United States
Epson (United States) United States
USC Institute for Creative Technologies relative to Snap (United States) United States Snap (United States)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Snap (United States) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at USC Institute for Creative Technologies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at USC Institute for Creative Technologies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at USC Institute for Creative Technologies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites USC Institute for Creative Technologies more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at USC Institute for Creative Technologies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with USC Institute for Creative Technologies at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with USC Institute for Creative Technologies at the time of their publication.

About USC Institute for Creative Technologies

In recent decades, authors affiliated with USC Institute for Creative Technologies have published 331 papers, which have received a total of 10.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 47 papers in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, 52 papers in Human-Computer Interaction, 118 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 5 papers in General Decision Sciences and 54 papers in Social Psychology on the topics of Advanced Vision and Imaging (51 papers), Speech and dialogue systems (49 papers), Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (47 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (42 papers), 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis (39 papers), Human Motion and Animation (29 papers), Face recognition and analysis (29 papers) and Topic Modeling (27 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (2.0k citations), Human-Computer Interaction (1.6k citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (5.6k citations), Computational Mechanics (2.1k citations) and Applied Psychology (371 citations). Authors at USC Institute for Creative Technologies collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including ACM Transactions on Graphics, Computer Graphics Forum, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, Computer and IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing. Some of USC Institute for Creative Technologies's most productive authors include Paul Debevec, Hao Li, Louis‐Philippe Morency, Jonathan Gratch, David Traum, Mark Bolas, Evan A. Suma, Gale Lucas, Angjoo Kanazawa and Shunsuke Saito.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact