Science and Technology Park of Crete

309 papers receiving 8.2k citations

Peers

Science and Technology Park of Crete
Comparison fields: 5 of 226
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 211
  • Human-Computer Interaction 479
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 688
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 927
  • Materials Chemistry 1.2k
Replace Centre for Technological Research of Crete with:
Centre for Technological Research of Crete Greece
Mevlana University Türkiye
Burgas Free University Bulgaria
Microelectronica (Romania) Romania
Canadian International College Egypt
American University of Science and Technology Lebanon
Cairo Higher Institute Egypt
Consorzio Pisa Ricerche Italy
University of Library Studies and Information Technologies Bulgaria
University of Dunaújváros Hungary
Science and Technology Park of Crete relative to Centre for Technological Research of Crete Greece Centre for Technological Research of Crete's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×50×100×150×211×
Centre for Technological Research of Crete · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Science and Technology Park of Crete

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Science and Technology Park of Crete. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Science and Technology Park of Crete with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Science and Technology Park of Crete more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Science and Technology Park of Crete

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Science and Technology Park of Crete at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Science and Technology Park of Crete at the time of their publication.

About Science and Technology Park of Crete

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Science and Technology Park of Crete have published 345 papers, which have received a total of 8.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 28 papers in Human-Computer Interaction, 9 papers in Human Factors and Ergonomics, 2 papers in Aging, 7 papers in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes and 8 papers in Information Systems and Management on the topics of Usability and User Interface Design (23 papers), Digital Accessibility for Disabilities (9 papers), Speech and dialogue systems (9 papers), Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (9 papers), Gene expression and cancer classification (9 papers), Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies (7 papers), Network Traffic and Congestion Control (7 papers) and Interconnection Networks and Systems (7 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Human Factors and Ergonomics (211 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (479 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (688 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (927 citations) and Materials Chemistry (1.2k citations). Authors at Science and Technology Park of Crete collaborate with scholars in Greece, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Applied Physics, Interacting with Computers, International Journal of Medical Sciences, Advanced Functional Materials and Scientific Reports. Some of Science and Technology Park of Crete's most productive authors include Vangelis Sakkalis, Constantine Stephanidis, Anthony Savidis, Lucian A. Taylor, Ioannis Tsamardinos, Nikolaos Tsamis, R. P. Woodard, Tobias Kampfrath, József Fülöp and Stelios Tzortzakis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact