SOAS University of London

117.4k citations
6.9k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

SOAS University of London

5.5k papers receiving 102.6k citations

Peers

SOAS University of London
Comparison fields: 5 of 240
  • Development 4.5k
  • Business and International Management 2.1k
  • Sociology and Political Science 39.5k
  • Anthropology 8.6k
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7.0k
Replace University of the West of England with:
University of the West of England United Kingdom
Institut d'Etudes Politiques de Paris France
University of Stirling United Kingdom
University of Westminster United Kingdom
Institute of Development Studies United Kingdom
University of Greenwich United Kingdom
École des hautes études en sciences sociales France
London Metropolitan University United Kingdom
London Business School United Kingdom
University of East London United Kingdom
SOAS University of London relative to University of the West of England United Kingdom University of the West of England's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.4×
University of the West of England · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at SOAS University of London

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at SOAS University of London. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at SOAS University of London with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites SOAS University of London more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at SOAS University of London

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with SOAS University of London at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with SOAS University of London at the time of their publication.

About SOAS University of London

In recent decades, authors affiliated with SOAS University of London have published 6.9k papers, which have received a total of 117.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 815 papers in Anthropology, 1.8k papers in Political Science and International Relations, 233 papers in Development, 2.7k papers in Sociology and Political Science and 383 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance on the topics of Islamic Studies and History (283 papers), African history and culture studies (266 papers), International Development and Aid (227 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (212 papers), Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (196 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (183 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (176 papers) and Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (171 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Development (4.5k citations), Business and International Management (2.1k citations), Sociology and Political Science (39.5k citations), Anthropology (8.6k citations) and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (7.0k citations). Authors at SOAS University of London collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, Mexico and United States and have published in prestigious journals including African Affairs, International Affairs, Pacific Affairs, Journal of Agrarian Change and The Journal of Peasant Studies. Some of SOAS University of London's most productive authors include Terence J. Byres, David Mosse, Ben Fine, Henry T. Bernstein, J. A. Allan, Andréa Cornwall, Carlos Oya, Laixiang Sun, Rachel K. Jewkes and Mushtaq Khan.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact