Scottish Natural Heritage
Impact in
- Ecology top 10%
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Avian ecology and behavior
- Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
- Ecological Modeling top 5%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
Papers in
- Ecology 354
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation 116
- Avian ecology and behavior 104
- Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies 40
-
- Fish Ecology and Management Studies 85
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 70
- Top scholars
- Des B. A. ThompsonPhilip J. BoonD. Philip WhitfieldJohn E. GordonMartin J. GaywoodLee C. HastieColin W. BeanRhys Bullman
- Journals
- Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems (47 papers)Bird Study (34 papers)Biological Conservation (31 papers)Ibis (18 papers)Zootaxa (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Scottish Natural Heritage
568 papers receiving 16.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 176
- Ecology 9.7k
- Ecological Modeling 1.6k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 4.4k
- Global and Planetary Change 3.4k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 2.7k
Countries citing scholars working at Scottish Natural Heritage
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Scottish Natural Heritage. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Scottish Natural Heritage with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scottish Natural Heritage more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Scottish Natural Heritage
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Scottish Natural Heritage at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Scottish Natural Heritage at the time of their publication.
About Scottish Natural Heritage
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Scottish Natural Heritage have published 588 papers, which have received a total of 17.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 354 papers in Ecology, 164 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 57 papers in Ecological Modeling, 129 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 93 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics on the topics of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (116 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (104 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (85 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (70 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (57 papers), Marine and fisheries research (43 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (40 papers) and Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (40 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecology (9.7k citations), Ecological Modeling (1.6k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (4.4k citations), Global and Planetary Change (3.4k citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (2.7k citations). Authors at Scottish Natural Heritage collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, Bird Study, Biological Conservation, Ibis and Zootaxa. Some of Scottish Natural Heritage's most productive authors include Des B. A. Thompson, Philip J. Boon, D. Philip Whitfield, John E. Gordon, John E. Gordon, Martin J. Gaywood, Lee C. Hastie, Colin W. Bean, Rhys Bullman and Michael B. Usher.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.