Singapore National Eye Center
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 0.05%
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Retinal and Optic Conditions
-
- Retinal Imaging and Analysis
- Corneal surgery and disorders
- Corneal Surgery and Treatments
Papers in
- Ophthalmology 2.2k
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 1.0k
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments 932
- Retinal and Optic Conditions 321
-
- Retinal Imaging and Analysis 701
- Corneal surgery and disorders 601
- Corneal Surgery and Treatments 351
- Top scholars
- Tien Yin WongTin AungChing‐Yu ChengChui Ming Gemmy CheungDonald TanRonald KleinJodhbir S. MehtaSeang‐Mei Saw
- Journals
- Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (458 papers)British Journal of Ophthalmology (278 papers)Ophthalmology (257 papers)American Journal of Ophthalmology (197 papers)Scientific Reports (127 papers)
- Partner nations
- SingaporeUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Singapore National Eye Center
3.9k papers receiving 162.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 234
- Ophthalmology 94.0k
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 74.0k
- Health Informatics 2.7k
- Epidemiology 24.6k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 18.4k
Countries citing scholars working at Singapore National Eye Center
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Singapore National Eye Center. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Singapore National Eye Center with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Singapore National Eye Center more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Singapore National Eye Center
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Singapore National Eye Center at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Singapore National Eye Center at the time of their publication.
About Singapore National Eye Center
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Singapore National Eye Center have published 4.8k papers, which have received a total of 202.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 2.2k papers in Ophthalmology, 1.6k papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 68 papers in Health Informatics, 527 papers in Epidemiology and 428 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health on the topics of Glaucoma and retinal disorders (1.0k papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (932 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (701 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (601 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (440 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (367 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (351 papers) and Retinal and Optic Conditions (321 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ophthalmology (94.0k citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (74.0k citations), Health Informatics (2.7k citations), Epidemiology (24.6k citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (18.4k citations). Authors at Singapore National Eye Center collaborate with scholars in Singapore, United States and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, British Journal of Ophthalmology, Ophthalmology, American Journal of Ophthalmology and Scientific Reports. Some of Singapore National Eye Center's most productive authors include Tien Yin Wong, Tin Aung, Ching‐Yu Cheng, Chui Ming Gemmy Cheung, Donald Tan, Ronald Klein, Jodhbir S. Mehta, Seang‐Mei Saw, Ning Cheung and Paul Mitchell.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.