Singapore Eye Research Institute
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 0.05%
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Retinal and Optic Conditions
-
- Retinal Imaging and Analysis
- Corneal surgery and disorders
- Corneal Surgery and Treatments
Papers in
- Ophthalmology 2.1k
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 1.0k
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments 922
- Retinal and Optic Conditions 291
-
- Retinal Imaging and Analysis 744
- Corneal surgery and disorders 613
- Corneal Surgery and Treatments 351
- Top scholars
- Tien Yin WongSeang‐Mei SawTin AungXian Jun LohChing‐Yu ChengChui Ming Gemmy CheungPaul MitchellJodhbir S. Mehta
- Journals
- Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (566 papers)British Journal of Ophthalmology (249 papers)Ophthalmology (226 papers)American Journal of Ophthalmology (177 papers)Scientific Reports (162 papers)
- Partner nations
- SingaporeUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Singapore Eye Research Institute
4.4k papers receiving 183.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 234
- Ophthalmology 87.4k
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 71.5k
- Health Informatics 2.3k
- Epidemiology 29.2k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 19.2k
Countries citing scholars working at Singapore Eye Research Institute
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Singapore Eye Research Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Singapore Eye Research Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Singapore Eye Research Institute more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Singapore Eye Research Institute
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Singapore Eye Research Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Singapore Eye Research Institute at the time of their publication.
About Singapore Eye Research Institute
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Singapore Eye Research Institute have published 5.3k papers, which have received a total of 225.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 2.1k papers in Ophthalmology, 1.7k papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 59 papers in Health Informatics, 586 papers in Epidemiology and 476 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health on the topics of Glaucoma and retinal disorders (1.0k papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (922 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (744 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (613 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (499 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (412 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (351 papers) and Retinal and Optic Conditions (291 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ophthalmology (87.4k citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (71.5k citations), Health Informatics (2.3k citations), Epidemiology (29.2k citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (19.2k citations). Authors at Singapore Eye Research Institute collaborate with scholars in Singapore, United States and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, British Journal of Ophthalmology, Ophthalmology, American Journal of Ophthalmology and Scientific Reports. Some of Singapore Eye Research Institute's most productive authors include Tien Yin Wong, Seang‐Mei Saw, Tin Aung, Xian Jun Loh, Ching‐Yu Cheng, Chui Ming Gemmy Cheung, Paul Mitchell, Jodhbir S. Mehta, Ning Cheung and Jie Jin Wang.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.