Singapore Eye Research Institute
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 0.1%
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Health Informatics top 0.5%
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Papers in
- Ophthalmology 2.5k
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments 1.1k
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 906
- Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome 181
-
- Retinal Imaging and Analysis 777
- Corneal surgery and disorders 432
- Corneal Surgery and Treatments 211
- Top scholars
- Tien Yin WongSeang‐Mei SawTin AungChing‐Yu ChengXian Jun LohChui Ming Gemmy CheungJodhbir Singh MehtaPaul Mitchell
- Journals
- Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (552 papers)British Journal of Ophthalmology (272 papers)Ophthalmology (246 papers)American Journal of Ophthalmology (190 papers)Scientific Reports (170 papers)
- Partner nations
- SingaporeUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Singapore Eye Research Institute
5.5k papers receiving 258.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 235
- Ophthalmology 96.5k
- Health Informatics 6.4k
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 57.3k
- Epidemiology 36.1k
- Biomaterials 7.6k
Countries citing scholars working at Singapore Eye Research Institute
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Singapore Eye Research Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Singapore Eye Research Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Singapore Eye Research Institute more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Singapore Eye Research Institute
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Singapore Eye Research Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Singapore Eye Research Institute at the time of their publication.
About Singapore Eye Research Institute
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Singapore Eye Research Institute have published 5.8k papers, which have received a total of 259k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 2.5k papers in Ophthalmology, 1.5k papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 154 papers in Health Informatics, 719 papers in Epidemiology and 429 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health on the topics of Retinal Diseases and Treatments (1.1k papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (906 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (777 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (648 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (432 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (323 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (211 papers) and Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (181 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ophthalmology (96.5k citations), Health Informatics (6.4k citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (57.3k citations), Epidemiology (36.1k citations) and Biomaterials (7.6k citations). Authors at Singapore Eye Research Institute collaborate with scholars in Singapore, United States and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, British Journal of Ophthalmology, Ophthalmology, American Journal of Ophthalmology and Scientific Reports. Some of Singapore Eye Research Institute's most productive authors include Tien Yin Wong, Seang‐Mei Saw, Tin Aung, Ching‐Yu Cheng, Xian Jun Loh, Chui Ming Gemmy Cheung, Jodhbir Singh Mehta, Paul Mitchell, Donald T.H. Tan and Ning Cheung.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.