Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart
Impact in
- Paleontology top 2%
- Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
- Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
-
- Ichthyology and Marine Biology
Papers in
- Paleontology 575
- Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology 335
- Evolution and Paleontology Studies 316
- Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils 131
-
- Plant and animal studies 234
- Fossil Insects in Amber 124
- Top scholars
- Rainer R. SchochErin E. MaxwellGünter SchweigertAnita Roth‐NebelsickGünter BechlyGerd von WahlertWalter J. BockReinhard Ziegler
- Journals
- Zootaxa (97 papers)ZooKeys (54 papers)Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology (46 papers)Paläontologische Zeitschrift (37 papers)PLoS ONE (28 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart
1.4k papers receiving 27.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 197
- Paleontology 11.0k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 6.5k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 9.8k
- Ecological Modeling 1.2k
- Ecology 4.6k
Countries citing scholars working at Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart at the time of their publication.
About Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart have published 1.6k papers, which have received a total of 28.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 575 papers in Paleontology, 677 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 363 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 190 papers in Insect Science and 66 papers in Ecological Modeling on the topics of Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology (335 papers), Evolution and Paleontology Studies (316 papers), Ichthyology and Marine Biology (248 papers), Plant and animal studies (234 papers), Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (133 papers), Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (131 papers), Fossil Insects in Amber (124 papers) and Amphibian and Reptile Biology (110 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Paleontology (11.0k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (6.5k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (9.8k citations), Ecological Modeling (1.2k citations) and Ecology (4.6k citations). Authors at Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart collaborate with scholars in Germany, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Zootaxa, ZooKeys, Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, Paläontologische Zeitschrift and PLoS ONE. Some of Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart's most productive authors include Rainer R. Schoch, Erin E. Maxwell, Günter Schweigert, Anita Roth‐Nebelsick, Günter Bechly, Gerd von Wahlert, Walter J. Bock, Reinhard Ziegler, Ronald Fricke and Hans‐Dieter Sues.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.