Smith College

165.5k citations
5.9k papers ·

Impact in

    • Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
    • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
    • Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
    • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
    • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Papers in

Smith College

5.1k papers receiving 149.5k citations

Peers

Smith College
Comparison fields: 5 of 249
  • Clinical Psychology 32.2k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 13.0k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 13.3k
  • Social Psychology 14.2k
  • Applied Psychology 3.2k
Replace Wesleyan University with:
Wesleyan University United States
Williams College United States
City College of New York United States
Lehigh University United States
University of New Hampshire United States
Queens College, CUNY United States
Clark University United States
University of New Hampshire at Manchester United States
Hofstra University United States
Hunter College United States
Smith College relative to Wesleyan University United States Wesleyan University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Wesleyan University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Smith College

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Smith College. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Smith College with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Smith College more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Smith College

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Smith College at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Smith College at the time of their publication.

About Smith College

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Smith College have published 5.9k papers, which have received a total of 165.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 165 papers in Public Administration, 167 papers in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, 693 papers in Clinical Psychology, 39 papers in Architecture and 73 papers in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics on the topics of Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation (166 papers), Protist diversity and phylogeny (152 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (138 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (123 papers), Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (123 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (111 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (106 papers) and Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (103 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Clinical Psychology (32.2k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (13.0k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (13.3k citations), Social Psychology (14.2k citations) and Applied Psychology (3.2k citations). Authors at Smith College collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including The Astrophysical Journal, Clinical Social Work Journal, Behaviour Research and Therapy, Journal of American History and PLoS ONE. Some of Smith College's most productive authors include Randy O. Frost, Gail S. Steketee, Nicholas J. Horton, Joseph O’Rourke, Byron L. Zamboanga, Laura A. Katz, Seth J. Schwartz, Robert G. Sargent, Mary E. Harrington and James Winship Drisko.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact