St. Mary's College of Maryland

26.4k citations
1.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

St. Mary's College of Maryland

920 papers receiving 24.8k citations

Peers

St. Mary's College of Maryland
Comparison fields: 5 of 241
  • Developmental Biology 705
  • Safety Research 2.4k
  • Clinical Psychology 3.9k
  • Social Psychology 3.1k
  • Education 3.3k
Replace Washington College with:
Washington College United States
Shippensburg University United States
Sacred Heart University United States
University of Mary Washington United States
Millersville University United States
New York State University College of Human Ecology United States
St. Andrews University United States
Christopher Newport University United States
Gallaudet University United States
American Association For The Advancement of Science United States
St. Mary's College of Maryland relative to Washington College United States Washington College's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.7×
Washington College · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at St. Mary's College of Maryland

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at St. Mary's College of Maryland. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at St. Mary's College of Maryland with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites St. Mary's College of Maryland more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at St. Mary's College of Maryland

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with St. Mary's College of Maryland at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with St. Mary's College of Maryland at the time of their publication.

About St. Mary's College of Maryland

In recent decades, authors affiliated with St. Mary's College of Maryland have published 1.1k papers, which have received a total of 26.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 29 papers in Developmental Biology, 8 papers in Archeology, 49 papers in Safety Research, 7 papers in General Psychology and 91 papers in Clinical Psychology on the topics of Animal Behavior and Reproduction (37 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (36 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (29 papers), Plant and animal studies (28 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (25 papers), Market Dynamics and Volatility (24 papers), Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies (23 papers) and Career Development and Diversity (20 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Developmental Biology (705 citations), Safety Research (2.4k citations), Clinical Psychology (3.9k citations), Social Psychology (3.1k citations) and Education (3.3k citations). Authors at St. Mary's College of Maryland collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and Türkiye and have published in prestigious journals including Historical Archaeology, Applied Optics, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, PLoS ONE and Biological Bulletin. Some of St. Mary's College of Maryland's most productive authors include Angela C. Johnson, Heidi B. Carlone, Laraine Masters Glidden, Elizabeth Nutt Williams, J. Jordan Price, Karen L. Suyemoto, Clara E. Hill, Shirley A. Hess, Sarah Knox and C. Eren Işık.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact