Stephen F. Austin State University

31.9k citations
2.7k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen F. Austin State University

2.4k papers receiving 31.9k citations

Peers

Stephen F. Austin State University
Comparison fields: 5 of 241
  • Space and Planetary Science 379
  • Ecology 3.2k
  • Applied Psychology 601
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.1k
  • Paleontology 930
Replace The University of Texas at Tyler with:
The University of Texas at Tyler United States
Sam Houston State University United States
Missouri State University United States
Trinity University United States
University of Louisiana at Monroe United States
Southern Illinois University Edwardsville United States
Murray State University United States
University of Central Arkansas United States
The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley United States
University of West Florida United States
Stephen F. Austin State University relative to The University of Texas at Tyler United States The University of Texas at Tyler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.5×
The University of Texas at Tyler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Stephen F. Austin State University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Stephen F. Austin State University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Stephen F. Austin State University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen F. Austin State University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Stephen F. Austin State University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Stephen F. Austin State University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Stephen F. Austin State University at the time of their publication.

About Stephen F. Austin State University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Stephen F. Austin State University have published 2.7k papers, which have received a total of 31.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 202 papers in Space and Planetary Science, 253 papers in Paleontology, 238 papers in Archeology, 139 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 148 papers in Anthropology on the topics of Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (246 papers), Archaeological and Geological Studies (214 papers), Archaeological Research and Protection (202 papers), Indigenous Cultures and History (94 papers), Forest ecology and management (69 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (67 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (51 papers) and Behavioral and Psychological Studies (45 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Space and Planetary Science (379 citations), Ecology (3.2k citations), Applied Psychology (601 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.1k citations) and Paleontology (930 citations). Authors at Stephen F. Austin State University collaborate with scholars in United States, China and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, Journal of Forestry, Forest Science, Forest Ecology and Management and Mycologia. Some of Stephen F. Austin State University's most productive authors include shiyou Li, Alexander Y. Karatayev, Lyubov E. Burlakova, Michael D. Stroup, Timothy K. Perttula, Dianna K. Padilla, Michael L. Collyer, Ellen L. Csikai, David M. Lawson and Patrick M. Jenlink.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact