Madrid Health Service
Impact in
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 5%
- Frailty in Older Adults
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Papers in
- Top scholars
- Ángel Gil de MiguelJosé Luis del BarrioJosé Manuel Márquez EstradaFrancisco J. AcostaMiguel Á. Salinero-FortIsabel del Cura-GonzálezGabriel RubioAlfredo García‐Arieta
- Journals
- PLoS ONE (53 papers)Value in Health (30 papers)International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (26 papers)Journal of Clinical Medicine (25 papers)BMJ Open (24 papers)
- Partner nations
- SpainUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Madrid Health Service
1.9k papers receiving 28.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 227
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 1.1k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 3.0k
- Family Practice 286
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 176
- Internal Medicine 438
Countries citing scholars working at Madrid Health Service
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Madrid Health Service. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Madrid Health Service with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Madrid Health Service more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Madrid Health Service
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Madrid Health Service at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Madrid Health Service at the time of their publication.
About Madrid Health Service
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Madrid Health Service have published 2.7k papers, which have received a total of 39.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 17 papers in Issues, ethics and legal aspects, 45 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology, 20 papers in Family Practice, 141 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 185 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine on the topics of Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (64 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (59 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (47 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (44 papers), Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (41 papers), Healthcare Systems and Technology (38 papers), Influenza Virus Research Studies (38 papers) and Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health (37 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Geriatrics and Gerontology (1.1k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (3.0k citations), Family Practice (286 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (176 citations) and Internal Medicine (438 citations). Authors at Madrid Health Service collaborate with scholars in Spain, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Value in Health, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Journal of Clinical Medicine and BMJ Open. Some of Madrid Health Service's most productive authors include Ángel Gil de Miguel, José Luis del Barrio, José Manuel Márquez Estrada, Francisco J. Acosta, Miguel Á. Salinero-Fort, Isabel del Cura-González, Gabriel Rubio, Alfredo García‐Arieta, Antonio Cano‐Vindel and Leonardo Adrián Medrano.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.