Scottish Environment Protection Agency

11.1k citations
450 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Scottish Environment Protection Agency

410 papers receiving 10.8k citations

Peers

Scottish Environment Protection Agency
Comparison fields: 5 of 198
  • Environmental Chemistry 1.7k
  • Water Science and Technology 2.3k
  • Ecology 3.4k
  • Global and Planetary Change 2.6k
  • Oceanography 1.3k
Replace Ecolab (United Kingdom) with:
Ecolab (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
Sands United Kingdom
Department of the Environment United Kingdom
Gwynedd Council United Kingdom
Severn Trent (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
International Institute for Environment and Development United Kingdom
Thames Water (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
Anglian Water Services (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
Drylands Research United Kingdom
Ecology and Ecosystem Health France
Scottish Environment Protection Agency relative to Ecolab (United Kingdom) United Kingdom Ecolab (United Kingdom)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Ecolab (United Kingdom) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Scottish Environment Protection Agency

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Scottish Environment Protection Agency. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Scottish Environment Protection Agency with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scottish Environment Protection Agency more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Scottish Environment Protection Agency

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Scottish Environment Protection Agency at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Scottish Environment Protection Agency at the time of their publication.

About Scottish Environment Protection Agency

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Scottish Environment Protection Agency have published 450 papers, which have received a total of 11.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 69 papers in Environmental Chemistry, 92 papers in Water Science and Technology, 49 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 84 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 97 papers in Ecology on the topics of Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (56 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (48 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (39 papers), Flood Risk Assessment and Management (35 papers), Water Quality and Pollution Assessment (33 papers), Marine Biology and Ecology Research (24 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (21 papers) and Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics (19 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Environmental Chemistry (1.7k citations), Water Science and Technology (2.3k citations), Ecology (3.4k citations), Global and Planetary Change (2.6k citations) and Oceanography (1.3k citations). Authors at Scottish Environment Protection Agency collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, China and United States and have published in prestigious journals including The Science of The Total Environment, Marine Pollution Bulletin, Water Science & Technology, Water and Environment Journal and Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. Some of Scottish Environment Protection Agency's most productive authors include Yong Ren, Åsa Hedmark, Miklas Scholz, Atif Mustafa, Birol Kayranlı, David Sear, Brian J. D’Arcy, Stuart M. Greig, Paul A. Carling and Christina Knussen.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact