Saigon University

9.5k citations
1.0k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Saigon University

819 papers receiving 9.0k citations

Peers

Saigon University
Comparison fields: 5 of 226
  • Water Science and Technology 846
  • Numerical Analysis 339
  • Waste Management and Disposal 506
  • Pollution 646
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 857
Replace Thu Dau Mot University with:
Thu Dau Mot University Vietnam
Dalat University Vietnam
Ho Chi Minh City International University Vietnam
Quy Nhon University Vietnam
Nha Trang University Vietnam
An Giang University Vietnam
Lac Hong University Vietnam
Vinh University Vietnam
Institute of Scientific and Technical Information China
University of Science and Technology - The University of Da Nang Vietnam
Saigon University relative to Thu Dau Mot University Vietnam Thu Dau Mot University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.2×
Thu Dau Mot University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Saigon University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Saigon University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Saigon University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Saigon University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Saigon University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Saigon University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Saigon University at the time of their publication.

About Saigon University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Saigon University have published 1.0k papers, which have received a total of 9.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 40 papers in Numerical Analysis, 80 papers in Water Science and Technology, 50 papers in Mathematical Physics, 42 papers in Waste Management and Disposal and 83 papers in Computational Theory and Mathematics on the topics of Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques (40 papers), Optimization and Variational Analysis (33 papers), Numerical methods in inverse problems (29 papers), Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research (29 papers), Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (28 papers), Advanced oxidation water treatment (26 papers), Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal (23 papers) and Membrane Separation Technologies (21 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Water Science and Technology (846 citations), Numerical Analysis (339 citations), Waste Management and Disposal (506 citations), Pollution (646 citations) and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (857 citations). Authors at Saigon University collaborate with scholars in Vietnam, Taiwan and South Korea and have published in prestigious journals including Chemistry & Biodiversity, Environmental Technology & Innovation, RSC Advances, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports. Some of Saigon University's most productive authors include Huynh Huynh, Leonard S. Feldt, Ha Manh Bui, Thái Doãn Chương, Pham The Bao, Ngan Thi Thu Tran, Ly Thi Huong Luu Le, Pham Huu Anh Ngoc, Tran Thai Ha Nguyen and Xuan‐Thanh Bui.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact