Real-Time Innovations (United States)

5.7k citations
239 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Real-Time Innovations (United States)

187 papers receiving 4.9k citations

Peers

Real-Time Innovations (United States)
Comparison fields: 5 of 211
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 591
  • Hardware and Architecture 281
  • Transportation 187
  • Family Practice 45
  • Health Informatics 34
Replace Fistula Foundation with:
Fistula Foundation United States
State of California United States
T-Mobile (United States) United States
Owl Research Institute United States
MARK Resources (United States) United States
Evergreen Health Medical Center United States
NortonLifeLock (United States) United States
Kingston Technology (United States) United States
Machine Intelligence Research Institute United States
OFM Research (United States) United States
Real-Time Innovations (United States) relative to Fistula Foundation United States Fistula Foundation's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20.8×
Fistula Foundation · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Real-Time Innovations (United States)

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Real-Time Innovations (United States). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Real-Time Innovations (United States) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Real-Time Innovations (United States) more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Real-Time Innovations (United States)

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Real-Time Innovations (United States) at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Real-Time Innovations (United States) at the time of their publication.

About Real-Time Innovations (United States)

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Real-Time Innovations (United States) have published 239 papers, which have received a total of 5.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 23 papers in Hardware and Architecture, 32 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 2 papers in Research and Theory, 30 papers in Computer Networks and Communications and 9 papers in Aquatic Science on the topics of Fish Ecology and Management Studies (32 papers), Real-Time Systems Scheduling (20 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (15 papers), Embedded Systems Design Techniques (15 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (12 papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (9 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (9 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (8 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (591 citations), Hardware and Architecture (281 citations), Transportation (187 citations), Family Practice (45 citations) and Health Informatics (34 citations). Authors at Real-Time Innovations (United States) collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and China and have published in prestigious journals including Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, Journal for Nurses in Professional Development, North American Journal of Fisheries Management, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences and Health Affairs. Some of Real-Time Innovations (United States)'s most productive authors include Gerardo Pardo-Castellote, Kathleen N Lohr, Paul Drzaic, Ronald A. Castellino, Jerry Cromwell, Allen F. Evans, Ken Collis, Arthur C. Sanderson, W. D. Bachalo and Arnab Bose.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact