Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden
Impact in
-
- Plant Diversity and Evolution
- Plant and animal studies
- Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics
- Plant Science top 10%
- Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies
- Plant Parasitism and Resistance
Papers in
-
- Plant Diversity and Evolution 236
- Plant and animal studies 164
- Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics 63
- Plant Science 313
- Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies 128
- Plant Parasitism and Resistance 48
- Top scholars
- Sherwin CarlquistRobert F. ThorneLoren H. RiesebergM. Patrick GriffithVerne GrantPamela S. SoltisCarol WilsonNorman C. Ellstrand
- Journals
- Aliso (191 papers)American Journal of Botany (68 papers)Systematic Botany (31 papers)Taxon (30 papers)Mycologia (15 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomMexico
In The Last Decade
Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden
564 papers receiving 19.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 166
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 13.0k
- Plant Science 9.6k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 2.1k
- Molecular Biology 8.0k
- Genetics 2.8k
Countries citing scholars working at Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden at the time of their publication.
About Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden have published 611 papers, which have received a total of 20.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 405 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 313 papers in Plant Science, 52 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 67 papers in Food Science and 3 papers in Horticulture on the topics of Plant Diversity and Evolution (236 papers), Plant and animal studies (164 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (128 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (113 papers), Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics (63 papers), Botanical Research and Applications (54 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (48 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (48 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (13.0k citations), Plant Science (9.6k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (2.1k citations), Molecular Biology (8.0k citations) and Genetics (2.8k citations). Authors at Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Mexico and have published in prestigious journals including Aliso, American Journal of Botany, Systematic Botany, Taxon and Mycologia. Some of Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden's most productive authors include Sherwin Carlquist, Robert F. Thorne, Loren H. Rieseberg, M. Patrick Griffith, Verne Grant, Pamela S. Soltis, Carol Wilson, Norman C. Ellstrand, Linda M. Prince and Robert Thorne.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.