Retina Research Foundation

18.5k citations
435 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Retina Research Foundation

393 papers receiving 17.0k citations

Peers

Retina Research Foundation
Comparison fields: 5 of 205
  • Ophthalmology 3.8k
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 4.0k
  • Cell Biology 2.2k
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 2.6k
  • Immunology and Allergy 473
Replace Baylor Institute for Rehabilitation with:
Baylor Institute for Rehabilitation United States
University of North Texas System United States
Nanotherapeutics (United States) United States
Raymond G. Murphy VA Medical Center United States
Institute for Advanced Medical Research United States
Cincinnati Eye Institute United States
Winthrop Rockefeller Foundation United States
Michael Reese Research and Education Foundation United States
University Surgical Associates United States
Ocular Surface Center United States
Retina Research Foundation relative to Baylor Institute for Rehabilitation United States Baylor Institute for Rehabilitation's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×32.4×
Baylor Institute for Rehabilitation · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Retina Research Foundation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Retina Research Foundation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Retina Research Foundation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Retina Research Foundation more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Retina Research Foundation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Retina Research Foundation at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Retina Research Foundation at the time of their publication.

About Retina Research Foundation

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Retina Research Foundation have published 435 papers, which have received a total of 18.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 133 papers in Ophthalmology, 112 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 47 papers in Cell Biology, 47 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 9 papers in Biophysics on the topics of Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (45 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (43 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (39 papers), Retinal and Macular Surgery (36 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (33 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (29 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (28 papers) and Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (26 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ophthalmology (3.8k citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (4.0k citations), Cell Biology (2.2k citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (2.6k citations) and Immunology and Allergy (473 citations). Authors at Retina Research Foundation collaborate with scholars in United States, Germany and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Experimental Eye Research, Retina, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Ophthalmology and American Journal of Ophthalmology. Some of Retina Research Foundation's most productive authors include A. Martonosi, Frank J. Holly, John S. Gergely, Endre A. Balazs, Bengt O. Hedbys, David A. Swann, John C. Seidel, Saiichi Mishima, Miguel F. Refojo and Claes Henrik Dohlman.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact