Rehabilitation Institute of Michigan
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Psychological Testing and Assessment
-
- Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Papers in
-
- Psychological Testing and Assessment 41
-
- Medical Practices and Rehabilitation 29
- Top scholars
- Marcel P. J. M. DijkersScott R. MillisRobin A. HanksLisa J. RapportROSS D. ZAFONTEJoseph H. RickerNorman L. FichtenbergMitchell Rosenthal
- Journals
- Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (71 papers)The Clinical Neuropsychologist (30 papers)Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation (27 papers)Rehabilitation Psychology (20 papers)American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation (18 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaItaly
In The Last Decade
Rehabilitation Institute of Michigan
405 papers receiving 14.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 155
- Applied Psychology 1.1k
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 1k
- Epidemiology 4.8k
- Rehabilitation 590
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.4k
Countries citing scholars working at Rehabilitation Institute of Michigan
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Rehabilitation Institute of Michigan. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Rehabilitation Institute of Michigan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rehabilitation Institute of Michigan more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Rehabilitation Institute of Michigan
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Rehabilitation Institute of Michigan at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Rehabilitation Institute of Michigan at the time of their publication.
About Rehabilitation Institute of Michigan
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Rehabilitation Institute of Michigan have published 415 papers, which have received a total of 14.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 41 papers in Applied Psychology, 34 papers in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, 143 papers in Epidemiology, 25 papers in Occupational Therapy and 53 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine on the topics of Traumatic Brain Injury Research (139 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (46 papers), Psychological Testing and Assessment (41 papers), Medical Practices and Rehabilitation (29 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (17 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (16 papers), Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (16 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (15 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Applied Psychology (1.1k citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (1k citations), Epidemiology (4.8k citations), Rehabilitation (590 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.4k citations). Authors at Rehabilitation Institute of Michigan collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and Italy and have published in prestigious journals including Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The Clinical Neuropsychologist, Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation Psychology and American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. Some of Rehabilitation Institute of Michigan's most productive authors include Marcel P. J. M. Dijkers, Scott R. Millis, Robin A. Hanks, Lisa J. Rapport, ROSS D. ZAFONTE, Joseph H. Ricker, Norman L. Fichtenberg, Mitchell Rosenthal, Bradley N. Axelrod and Nancy H. McNevin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.