Royal Hobart Hospital

51.5k citations
2.4k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Royal Hobart Hospital

2.0k papers receiving 41.2k citations

Peers

Royal Hobart Hospital
Comparison fields: 5 of 217
  • Immunology and Allergy 1.6k
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 8.2k
  • Research and Theory 178
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 1.4k
  • Nephrology 1.4k
Replace Canberra Hospital with:
Canberra Hospital Australia
Cabrini Hospital Australia
St George Hospital Australia
Concord Repatriation General Hospital Australia
John Hunter Hospital Australia
Queen Elizabeth Hospital Australia
Northern Hospital Australia
Wollongong Hospital Australia
Sydney Hospital Australia
Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital Australia
Royal Hobart Hospital relative to Canberra Hospital Australia Canberra Hospital's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.5×
Canberra Hospital · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Royal Hobart Hospital

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Royal Hobart Hospital. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Royal Hobart Hospital with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Royal Hobart Hospital more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Royal Hobart Hospital

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Royal Hobart Hospital at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Royal Hobart Hospital at the time of their publication.

About Royal Hobart Hospital

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Royal Hobart Hospital have published 2.4k papers, which have received a total of 51.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 397 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 107 papers in Emergency Medicine, 60 papers in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, 31 papers in Internal Medicine and 132 papers in Neurology on the topics of Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (101 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (52 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (37 papers), Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (34 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (33 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (32 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (31 papers) and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (31 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Immunology and Allergy (1.6k citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (8.2k citations), Research and Theory (178 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (1.4k citations) and Nephrology (1.4k citations). Authors at Royal Hobart Hospital collaborate with scholars in Australia, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including The Medical Journal of Australia, Emergency Medicine Australasia, ANZ Journal of Surgery, Pathology and Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. Some of Royal Hobart Hospital's most productive authors include Simon G.A. Brown, John R. Burgess, Peter Anderson Dargaville, SAXBY A. PRIDMORE, Antonio G De Paoli, Graeme Jones, Peter Graham Davis, Leigh Blizzard, Gregory Mark Peterson and Bruce Taylor.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact