Royal College of Art

18.4k citations
1.2k papers ·

Impact in

    • Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
    • Interactive and Immersive Displays
    • Persona Design and Applications
    • Usability and User Interface Design
  • Museology top 2%

Papers in

    • Innovative Human-Technology Interaction 181
    • Interactive and Immersive Displays 39
    • Crafts, Textile, and Design 62
    • Fashion and Cultural Textiles 55

Royal College of Art

916 papers receiving 15.9k citations

Peers

Royal College of Art
Comparison fields: 5 of 233
  • Human-Computer Interaction 6.4k
  • Museology 833
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 1.6k
  • Architecture 199
  • Conservation 399
Replace University of the Arts London with:
University of the Arts London United Kingdom
Breda University of Applied Sciences Netherlands
Southampton Solent University United Kingdom
Glasgow School of Art United Kingdom
Zuyd University of Applied Sciences Netherlands
Fontys University of Applied Sciences Netherlands
University of Wales Trinity Saint David United Kingdom
Buckinghamshire New University United Kingdom
The Hague University of Applied Sciences Netherlands
Human Computer Interaction (Switzerland) Switzerland
Royal College of Art relative to University of the Arts London United Kingdom University of the Arts London's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.4×
University of the Arts London · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Royal College of Art

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Royal College of Art. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Royal College of Art with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Royal College of Art more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Royal College of Art

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Royal College of Art at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Royal College of Art at the time of their publication.

About Royal College of Art

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Royal College of Art have published 1.2k papers, which have received a total of 18.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 237 papers in Human-Computer Interaction, 112 papers in Museology, 41 papers in Architecture, 106 papers in Visual Arts and Performing Arts and 40 papers in Conservation on the topics of Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (181 papers), Design Education and Practice (117 papers), Crafts, Textile, and Design (62 papers), Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (55 papers), Fashion and Cultural Textiles (55 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (45 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (39 papers) and Color perception and design (34 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Human-Computer Interaction (6.4k citations), Museology (833 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (1.6k citations), Architecture (199 citations) and Conservation (399 citations). Authors at Royal College of Art collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and India and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Design History, Design Studies, Applied Ergonomics, interactions and The Journal of Architecture. Some of Royal College of Art's most productive authors include William W. Gaver, Lucy Kimbell, Elena Pacenti, T. C. Dunne, James Auger, Steve Benford, Roger Coleman, P. John Clarkson, Sarah E Pennington and Brendan Walker.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact