Institute of General and Experimental Biology
Impact in
-
- Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
-
- Phytochemistry and Biological Activities
- Medicinal Plant Research
- Plant chemical constituents analysis
Papers in
- Ecology 188
- Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology 68
- Parasite Biology and Host Interactions 39
- Plant Science 306
- Phytochemistry and Biological Activities 148
- Plant chemical constituents analysis 82
- Medicinal Plant Research 52
- Botany and Plant Ecology Studies 44
- Top scholars
- Daniil Nikolayevich OlennikovNadezhda Konstantinovna ChirikovaNina Igorevna KashchenkoOleg Arnoldovich AnenkhonovЛариса Максимовна ТанхаеваDenis Viktorovich SandanovIrina K. DambuevaMiroslava V Derenko
In The Last Decade
Institute of General and Experimental Biology
866 papers receiving 8.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 166
- Biochemistry 425
- Plant Science 2.1k
- Ecology 1.2k
- Atmospheric Science 619
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 653
Countries citing scholars working at Institute of General and Experimental Biology
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute of General and Experimental Biology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute of General and Experimental Biology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute of General and Experimental Biology more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Institute of General and Experimental Biology
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute of General and Experimental Biology at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute of General and Experimental Biology at the time of their publication.
About Institute of General and Experimental Biology
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute of General and Experimental Biology have published 976 papers, which have received a total of 9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 188 papers in Ecology, 306 papers in Plant Science, 92 papers in Soil Science, 93 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 49 papers in Complementary and alternative medicine on the topics of Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (148 papers), Plant chemical constituents analysis (82 papers), Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (68 papers), Medicinal Plant Research (52 papers), Soil and Environmental Studies (49 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (44 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (40 papers) and Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (39 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Biochemistry (425 citations), Plant Science (2.1k citations), Ecology (1.2k citations), Atmospheric Science (619 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (653 citations). Authors at Institute of General and Experimental Biology collaborate with scholars in Russia, China and Mongolia and have published in prestigious journals including Molecules, Plants, Quaternary International, Eurasian Soil Science and Horticulturae. Some of Institute of General and Experimental Biology's most productive authors include Daniil Nikolayevich Olennikov, Nadezhda Konstantinovna Chirikova, Nina Igorevna Kashchenko, Oleg Arnoldovich Anenkhonov, Лариса Максимовна Танхаева, Denis Viktorovich Sandanov, Irina K. Dambueva, Miroslava V Derenko, B. А. Malyarchuk and G. A. Denisova.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.