Royal British Columbia Museum

7.1k citations
433 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Royal British Columbia Museum

406 papers receiving 7.1k citations

Peers

Royal British Columbia Museum
Comparison fields: 5 of 148
  • Paleontology 1.2k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.9k
  • Biotechnology 593
  • Ecology 989
  • Atmospheric Science 568
Replace Hakai Institute with:
Hakai Institute
Bamfield Marine Sciences Centre Canada
Cascadia Research Collective United States
Ministry of Environment Canada
National Clonal Germplasm Repository United States
Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History United States
Washington Department of Natural Resources United States
Washington State Department of Ecology United States
Marine Mammal Center United States
Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum United States
Royal British Columbia Museum relative to Hakai Institute Hakai Institute's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×16.0×
Hakai Institute · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Royal British Columbia Museum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Royal British Columbia Museum. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Royal British Columbia Museum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Royal British Columbia Museum more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Royal British Columbia Museum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Royal British Columbia Museum at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Royal British Columbia Museum at the time of their publication.

About Royal British Columbia Museum

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Royal British Columbia Museum have published 433 papers, which have received a total of 7.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 87 papers in Paleontology, 147 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 50 papers in Biotechnology, 29 papers in Oceanography and 55 papers in Ecology on the topics of Diptera species taxonomy and behavior (59 papers), Marine Sponges and Natural Products (50 papers), Fossil Insects in Amber (43 papers), Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology (35 papers), Marine Biology and Ecology Research (29 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (23 papers), Evolution and Paleontology Studies (20 papers) and Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology (20 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Paleontology (1.2k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.9k citations), Biotechnology (593 citations), Ecology (989 citations) and Atmospheric Science (568 citations). Authors at Royal British Columbia Museum collaborate with scholars in Canada, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Zootaxa, Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, ZooKeys, PLoS ONE and Insect Systematics & Evolution. Some of Royal British Columbia Museum's most productive authors include Art Borkent, Richard J. Hebda, Henry M. Reiswig, Nancy J. Turner, S. Bruce Archibald, Jeremy R deWaard, Rolf W. Mathewes, Kendrick J. Brown, Paul D. N. Hebert and Sally P. Leys.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact