Queen Mary University of London

2.6M citations
79.7k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Queen Mary University of London

69.0k papers receiving 2.3M citations

Peers

Queen Mary University of London
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Periodontics 28.7k
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 93.1k
  • Immunology 106.1k
  • Orthodontics 19.6k
  • Molecular Biology 333.6k
Replace University of Birmingham with:
University of Birmingham United Kingdom
King's College London United Kingdom
University of Sheffield United Kingdom
University of Bristol United Kingdom
University of Manchester United Kingdom
University of Leeds United Kingdom
Cardiff University United Kingdom
University of Amsterdam Netherlands
Imperial College London United Kingdom
Newcastle University United Kingdom
Queen Mary University of London relative to University of Birmingham United Kingdom University of Birmingham's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
University of Birmingham · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Queen Mary University of London

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Queen Mary University of London. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Queen Mary University of London with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Queen Mary University of London more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Queen Mary University of London

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Queen Mary University of London at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Queen Mary University of London at the time of their publication.

About Queen Mary University of London

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Queen Mary University of London have published 79.7k papers, which have received a total of 2.6M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 759 papers in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, 3.4k papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2.1k papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 603 papers in Orthodontics and 596 papers in Periodontics on the topics of Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (1.3k papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (1.2k papers), Antenna Design and Analysis (926 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (799 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (779 papers), Music and Audio Processing (762 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (669 papers) and Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (634 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Periodontics (28.7k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (93.1k citations), Immunology (106.1k citations), Orthodontics (19.6k citations) and Molecular Biology (333.6k citations). Authors at Queen Mary University of London collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports, Nature and BMJ Open. Some of Queen Mary University of London's most productive authors include Stephen A. Bustin, Frances R. Balkwill, Shaogang Gong, E.H. Mamdani, Nicholas R. Jennings, I. G. Macdonald, Yuanwei Liu, Nicola Maffulli, Stefan Priebe and Lars Chıttka.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact