Queen Mary University of London

3.3M citations
92.3k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Queen Mary University of London

87.4k papers receiving 3.3M citations

Peers

Queen Mary University of London
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Periodontics 44.8k
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 113.8k
  • Oncology 112.2k
  • Gastroenterology 32.6k
  • Genetics 135.8k
Replace University of Birmingham with:
University of Birmingham United Kingdom
University of Sheffield United Kingdom
University of Manchester United Kingdom
University of Bristol United Kingdom
King's College London United Kingdom
University of Leeds United Kingdom
Imperial College London United Kingdom
University of London United Kingdom
University of Amsterdam Netherlands
Newcastle University United Kingdom
Queen Mary University of London relative to University of Birmingham United Kingdom University of Birmingham's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
University of Birmingham · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Queen Mary University of London

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Queen Mary University of London. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Queen Mary University of London with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Queen Mary University of London more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Queen Mary University of London

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Queen Mary University of London at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Queen Mary University of London at the time of their publication.

About Queen Mary University of London

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Queen Mary University of London have published 92.3k papers, which have received a total of 3.3M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 946 papers in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, 1.1k papers in Periodontics, 3.3k papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 918 papers in Gastroenterology and 839 papers in Orthodontics on the topics of Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (1k papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (855 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (805 papers), Antenna Design and Analysis (746 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (630 papers), Finite Group Theory Research (606 papers), Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (600 papers) and Advanced Wireless Communication Technologies (595 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Periodontics (44.8k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (113.8k citations), Oncology (112.2k citations), Gastroenterology (32.6k citations) and Genetics (135.8k citations). Authors at Queen Mary University of London collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Italy and have published in prestigious journals including The Lancet, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, PLoS ONE, Nature and Scientific Reports. Some of Queen Mary University of London's most productive authors include Frances R. Balkwill, Stephen Andrew Bustin, Alberto Mantovani, Shaogang Gong, Nicola Maffulli, Nicholas R. Jennings, Ebrahim H. Mamdani, Nicholas Wald, Ian G. MacDonald and John Robert Vane.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact