The Queen's Medical Research Institute
Impact in
- Reproductive Medicine top 2%
- Sperm and Testicular Function
- Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 2%
- Stress Responses and Cortisol
Papers in
-
- Stress Responses and Cortisol 116
-
- Sperm and Testicular Function 87
- Endometriosis Research and Treatment 71
- Top scholars
- Jonathan R. SecklRebecca M. ReynoldsRichard M. SharpeHilary CritchleyNeil Cowan HendersonBrian Robert WalkerKaren E. ChapmanJohn Savill
- Journals
- PLoS ONE (79 papers)Endocrinology (70 papers)Scientific Reports (56 papers)The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (42 papers)Nature Communications (40 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
The Queen's Medical Research Institute
2.9k papers receiving 150.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 240
- Reproductive Medicine 14.0k
- Behavioral Neuroscience 5.1k
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 8.5k
- Immunology 23.3k
- Developmental Neuroscience 3.3k
Countries citing scholars working at The Queen's Medical Research Institute
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at The Queen's Medical Research Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at The Queen's Medical Research Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Queen's Medical Research Institute more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at The Queen's Medical Research Institute
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with The Queen's Medical Research Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with The Queen's Medical Research Institute at the time of their publication.
About The Queen's Medical Research Institute
In recent decades, authors affiliated with The Queen's Medical Research Institute have published 3.4k papers, which have received a total of 175.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 116 papers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 256 papers in Reproductive Medicine, 397 papers in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, 164 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology and 328 papers in Immunology on the topics of Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension (214 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (129 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (116 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (92 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (90 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (87 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (83 papers) and Endometriosis Research and Treatment (71 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Reproductive Medicine (14.0k citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (5.1k citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (8.5k citations), Immunology (23.3k citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (3.3k citations). Authors at The Queen's Medical Research Institute collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Endocrinology, Scientific Reports, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism and Nature Communications. Some of The Queen's Medical Research Institute's most productive authors include Jonathan R. Seckl, Rebecca M. Reynolds, Richard M. Sharpe, Hilary Critchley, Neil Cowan Henderson, Brian Robert Walker, Karen E. Chapman, John Savill, Charles Nicholas Serhan and Lee B. Smith.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.