Princeton University
Impact in
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 0.02%
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 0.01%
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Magnetic confinement fusion research
Papers in
-
- Magnetic confinement fusion research 3.9k
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics 2.1k
-
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena 2.7k
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies 2.6k
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories 2.5k
- Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics 2.4k
- Top scholars
- H. Vincent PoorDaniel J. KahnemanEdward H. WittenStephen R. ForrestJonathan D. CohenRobert Mccredie MaySimon A. LevinPaul DiMaggio
- Journals
- Physical Review Letters (2.5k papers)The Astrophysical Journal (2.2k papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2.0k papers)The Journal of Chemical Physics (1.3k papers)Nature (1.2k papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Princeton University
114.7k papers receiving 7.1M citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 708.7k
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 541.1k
- Instrumentation 107.0k
- General Decision Sciences 39.8k
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 276.6k
Countries citing scholars working at Princeton University
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Princeton University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Princeton University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Princeton University more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Princeton University
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Princeton University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Princeton University at the time of their publication.
About Princeton University
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Princeton University have published 125.1k papers, which have received a total of 7.5M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 9.7k papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 11.4k papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 1.8k papers in Instrumentation, 13.0k papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 4.3k papers in Condensed Matter Physics on the topics of Magnetic confinement fusion research (3.9k papers), Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (2.7k papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (2.6k papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (2.5k papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (2.4k papers), Climate variability and models (2.3k papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (2.1k papers) and Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (2.1k papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Astronomy and Astrophysics (708.7k citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (541.1k citations), Instrumentation (107.0k citations), General Decision Sciences (39.8k citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (276.6k citations). Authors at Princeton University collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Physical Review Letters, The Astrophysical Journal, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, The Journal of Chemical Physics and Nature. Some of Princeton University's most productive authors include H. Vincent Poor, Daniel J. Kahneman, Edward H. Witten, Stephen R. Forrest, Jonathan D. Cohen, Robert Mccredie May, Simon A. Levin, Paul DiMaggio, David W. C. MacMillan and Arnold J. Levine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.