Primate Conservation

26.8k citations
540 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Primate Conservation

510 papers receiving 24.7k citations

Peers

Primate Conservation
Comparison fields: 5 of 209
  • Virology 4.7k
  • Developmental Biology 864
  • Immunology 6.1k
  • Biological Psychiatry 538
  • Social Psychology 4.0k
Replace Enzo Life Sciences (United States) with:
Enzo Life Sciences (United States) United States
Applied BioPhysics (United States) United States
Organogenesis (United States) United States
East Orange VA Medical Center United States
Roosevelt Institute United States
Rockefeller University Hospital United States
Ontario Genomics Canada
Foundation for Biomedical Research United States
Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research United States
New England Aquarium United States
Primate Conservation relative to Enzo Life Sciences (United States) United States Enzo Life Sciences (United States)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×12×
Enzo Life Sciences (United States) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Primate Conservation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Primate Conservation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Primate Conservation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Primate Conservation more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Primate Conservation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Primate Conservation at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Primate Conservation at the time of their publication.

About Primate Conservation

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Primate Conservation have published 540 papers, which have received a total of 26.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 83 papers in Virology, 30 papers in Developmental Biology, 128 papers in Social Psychology, 88 papers in Immunology and 61 papers in Infectious Diseases on the topics of Primate Behavior and Ecology (119 papers), HIV Research and Treatment (82 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (49 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (36 papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (36 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (31 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (29 papers) and Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments (25 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Virology (4.7k citations), Developmental Biology (864 citations), Immunology (6.1k citations), Biological Psychiatry (538 citations) and Social Psychology (4.0k citations). Authors at Primate Conservation collaborate with scholars in United States, Germany and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Virology, Journal of Clinical Investigation, American Journal of Primatology, Journal of Medical Primatology and Primates. Some of Primate Conservation's most productive authors include Stephen F. Vatner, Norman L. Letvin, Stuart F. Schlossman, Chikao Morimoto, Christopher J. Miller, Keith G. Mansfield, Anja Widdig, Douglas M. Bowden, Murray B. Gardner and Dwight C. German.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact