Praxiling

3.0k citations
600 papers ·

Impact in

    • French Language Learning Methods
    • Linguistic Variation and Morphology
    • Historical Linguistics and Language Studies
    • Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
    • Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies

Papers in

Praxiling

475 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers

Praxiling
Comparison fields: 5 of 148
  • Linguistics and Language 674
  • Language and Linguistics 1.1k
  • Philosophy 1.1k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 497
  • Literature and Literary Theory 298
Replace Bases, Corpus, Langage with:
Bases, Corpus, Langage France
Langues, Textes, Traitements Informatiques, Cognition France
Institut Français de l'Éducation France
Analyse et Traitement Informatique de la Langue Française France
Structures Formelles du Langage France
Langage, langues et cultures d'Afrique France
Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage France
Histoire des Théories Linguistiques France
Leibniz Institute for the German Language Germany
Laboratoire Cognitions Humaine et Artificielle France
Praxiling relative to Bases, Corpus, Langage France Bases, Corpus, Langage's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Bases, Corpus, Langage · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Praxiling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Praxiling. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Praxiling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Praxiling more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Praxiling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Praxiling at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Praxiling at the time of their publication.

About Praxiling

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Praxiling have published 600 papers, which have received a total of 3.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 190 papers in Linguistics and Language, 301 papers in Philosophy, 199 papers in Language and Linguistics, 82 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 29 papers in Human-Computer Interaction on the topics of Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (300 papers), French Language Learning Methods (161 papers), Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (101 papers), Education, sociology, and vocational training (53 papers), Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts (40 papers), linguistics and terminology studies (39 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (39 papers) and Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (39 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Linguistics and Language (674 citations), Language and Linguistics (1.1k citations), Philosophy (1.1k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (497 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (298 citations). Authors at Praxiling collaborate with scholars in France, Estonia and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Langue française, Brain, Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, Journal of French Language Studies and Ampersand. Some of Praxiling's most productive authors include Jacques Brès, Rachel Panckhurst, Paul Siblot, Catherine Détrie, Christine Béal, Miki Mori, Kerry Mullan, Guillaume Herbet, Fabien Granjon and Hugues Duffau.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact