Bases, Corpus, Langage

2.7k citations
421 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Bases, Corpus, Langage

314 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

Bases, Corpus, Langage
Comparison fields: 5 of 194
  • Linguistics and Language 266
  • Language and Linguistics 430
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 431
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 317
  • Philosophy 294
Replace Centre Paul Albert-Février with:
Centre Paul Albert-Février France
Kliniken Schmieder Germany
Laboratoire d'étude de l'apprentissage et du développement France
Active Technologies (Italy) Italy
Pädagogische Hochschule Bern Switzerland
Dynamique des Capacités Humaines et des Conduites de Santé France
Institute for Computational Linguistics “A. Zampolli” Italy
Zürcher Fachhochschule Switzerland
Langues, Textes, Traitements Informatiques, Cognition France
Analyse et Traitement Informatique de la Langue Française France
Bases, Corpus, Langage relative to Centre Paul Albert-Février France Centre Paul Albert-Février's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12.1×
Centre Paul Albert-Février · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Bases, Corpus, Langage

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Bases, Corpus, Langage. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Bases, Corpus, Langage with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bases, Corpus, Langage more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Bases, Corpus, Langage

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Bases, Corpus, Langage at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Bases, Corpus, Langage at the time of their publication.

About Bases, Corpus, Langage

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Bases, Corpus, Langage have published 421 papers, which have received a total of 2.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 54 papers in Linguistics and Language, 97 papers in Language and Linguistics, 85 papers in Philosophy, 56 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 46 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology on the topics of Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (80 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (43 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (33 papers), Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (31 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (28 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (26 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (25 papers) and Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (23 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Linguistics and Language (266 citations), Language and Linguistics (430 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (431 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (317 citations) and Philosophy (294 citations). Authors at Bases, Corpus, Langage collaborate with scholars in France, United States and Belgium and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Languages, Journal of Neurolinguistics, Scientific Reports and Langue française. Some of Bases, Corpus, Langage's most productive authors include Tobias Scheer, Damon Mayaffre, Friederike Moltmann, Shona Whyte, Sylvie Mellet, Fabien Mathy, Frédéric Lavigne, Bénédicte de Boysson-Bardies, Paul Hofman and Kevin O’regan.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact