Ontario Tobacco Research Unit

10.9k citations
392 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Ontario Tobacco Research Unit

350 papers receiving 9.4k citations

Peers

Ontario Tobacco Research Unit
Comparison fields: 5 of 211
  • Physiology 4.5k
  • Applied Psychology 669
  • Ceramics and Composites 389
  • Health 498
  • Speech and Hearing 308
Replace Regional Municipality of Niagara with:
Regional Municipality of Niagara Canada
Stevenson University United States
Gaertner (United States) United States
Coatesville Veterans Affairs Medical Center United States
Grove City College United States
Clark Art Institute United States
Shaker Heights Public Library United States
Under Armour (United States) United States
Surrey Place Centre Canada
Learning Partnership Canada
Ontario Tobacco Research Unit relative to Regional Municipality of Niagara Canada Regional Municipality of Niagara's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.7×
Regional Municipality of Niagara · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Ontario Tobacco Research Unit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Ontario Tobacco Research Unit. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Ontario Tobacco Research Unit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ontario Tobacco Research Unit more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Ontario Tobacco Research Unit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Ontario Tobacco Research Unit at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Ontario Tobacco Research Unit at the time of their publication.

About Ontario Tobacco Research Unit

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Ontario Tobacco Research Unit have published 392 papers, which have received a total of 10.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 185 papers in Physiology, 22 papers in Applied Psychology, 1 paper in Medical Terminology, 16 papers in Speech and Hearing and 14 papers in Ceramics and Composites on the topics of Smoking Behavior and Cessation (180 papers), Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (24 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (22 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (16 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (16 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (14 papers), Glass properties and applications (14 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (10 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Physiology (4.5k citations), Applied Psychology (669 citations), Ceramics and Composites (389 citations), Health (498 citations) and Speech and Hearing (308 citations). Authors at Ontario Tobacco Research Unit collaborate with scholars in Canada, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Tobacco Control, Canadian Journal of Public Health, Nicotine & Tobacco Research, Journal of the American Ceramic Society and Addictive Behaviors. Some of Ontario Tobacco Research Unit's most productive authors include Joanna E Cohen, Roberta G. Ferrence, Michael Chaiton, Robert M. Schwartz, Susan J. Bondy, M. Krishna Murthy, Paul McDonald, Peter L. Selby, Lynn T. Kozlowski and Lori M. Diemert.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact