Ocular Proteomics (United States)
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 10%
- Ocular Oncology and Treatments
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Ocular Infections and Treatments
-
- Sports Performance and Training
Papers in
-
- Ocular Oncology and Treatments 19
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments 18
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 17
- Ocular Infections and Treatments 15
-
- Sports Performance and Training 20
- Sports injuries and prevention 17
- Top scholars
- Carol L. ShieldsGiovanni StaurenghiW.H. Wilson TangShadi AhmadmehrabiBenjamin KohlClifford S. DeutschmanEnrique O Graue-HernándezJosé Luis Tovilla-Canales
- Journals
- The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (25 papers)Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (14 papers)Cornea (14 papers)British Journal of Ophthalmology (10 papers)Retina (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesMexicoSpain
In The Last Decade
Ocular Proteomics (United States)
255 papers receiving 4.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 193
- Ophthalmology 1.3k
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 287
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 671
- Rheumatology 282
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 378
Countries citing scholars working at Ocular Proteomics (United States)
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Ocular Proteomics (United States). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Ocular Proteomics (United States) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ocular Proteomics (United States) more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Ocular Proteomics (United States)
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Ocular Proteomics (United States) at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Ocular Proteomics (United States) at the time of their publication.
About Ocular Proteomics (United States)
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Ocular Proteomics (United States) have published 350 papers, which have received a total of 5.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 78 papers in Ophthalmology, 24 papers in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, 47 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 22 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 9 papers in Dermatology on the topics of Sports Performance and Training (20 papers), Ocular Oncology and Treatments (19 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (19 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (18 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (17 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (17 papers), Ocular Infections and Treatments (15 papers) and Corneal Surgery and Treatments (13 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ophthalmology (1.3k citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (287 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (671 citations), Rheumatology (282 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (378 citations). Authors at Ocular Proteomics (United States) collaborate with scholars in United States, Mexico and Spain and have published in prestigious journals including The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Cornea, British Journal of Ophthalmology and Retina. Some of Ocular Proteomics (United States)'s most productive authors include Carol L. Shields, Giovanni Staurenghi, W.H. Wilson Tang, Shadi Ahmadmehrabi, Benjamin Kohl, Clifford S. Deutschman, Enrique O Graue-Hernández, José Luis Tovilla-Canales, Alejandro Navas and Robert L. Whetten.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.