Ontario Power Generation

277 papers receiving 5.3k citations

Peers

Ontario Power Generation
Comparison fields: 5 of 191
  • Control and Systems Engineering 1.0k
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 375
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 2.0k
  • Civil and Structural Engineering 686
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology 83
Replace Utility Development (United States) with:
Utility Development (United States) United States
Kinectrics (Canada) Canada
Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (United States) United States
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission United States
Consolidated Edison (United States) United States
INC Research (United States) United States
Office of Nuclear Energy United States
Fluent (United States) United States
Siemens (Canada) Canada
Office of Scientific and Technical Information United States
Ontario Power Generation relative to Utility Development (United States) United States Utility Development (United States)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Utility Development (United States) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Ontario Power Generation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Ontario Power Generation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Ontario Power Generation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ontario Power Generation more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Ontario Power Generation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Ontario Power Generation at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Ontario Power Generation at the time of their publication.

About Ontario Power Generation

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Ontario Power Generation have published 311 papers, which have received a total of 5.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 12 papers in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, 23 papers in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, 14 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 5 papers in Metals and Alloys and 15 papers in Radiation on the topics of High voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena (36 papers), Power Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation (30 papers), Non-Destructive Testing Techniques (28 papers), Fatigue and fracture mechanics (19 papers), Nuclear and radioactivity studies (18 papers), Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (15 papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (13 papers) and Risk and Safety Analysis (10 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Control and Systems Engineering (1.0k citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (375 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (2.0k citations), Civil and Structural Engineering (686 citations) and Energy Engineering and Power Technology (83 citations). Authors at Ontario Power Generation collaborate with scholars in Canada, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including Nuclear Engineering and Design, North American Journal of Fisheries Management, Applied Radiation and Isotopes, Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. Some of Ontario Power Generation's most productive authors include G.C. Stone, J. Densley, J. Endrenyi, Reza Iravani, Aaron L. Fogelson, Mahmoud Matar, Ian Culbert, Elaine Power, Zdravko Lukić and Saman Zarnani.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact