Operation PAR

651 papers receiving 9.9k citations

Peers

Operation PAR
Comparison fields: 5 of 220
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 958
  • Numerical Analysis 469
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 1.2k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 771
  • Emergency Medical Services 306
Replace Bank of America with:
Bank of America United States
University of South Carolina Upstate United States
Atlanta Technical College United States
Marcus (United States) United States
Simulation Technologies (United States) United States
United States Department of Labor United States
Bureau of Labor Statistics United States
Methodist University United States
Optimal Solutions (United States) United States
Citigroup United States
Operation PAR relative to Bank of America United States Bank of America's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.1×
Bank of America · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Operation PAR

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Operation PAR. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Operation PAR with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Operation PAR more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Operation PAR

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Operation PAR at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Operation PAR at the time of their publication.

About Operation PAR

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Operation PAR have published 792 papers, which have received a total of 12.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 101 papers in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, 72 papers in Management Science and Operations Research, 31 papers in Numerical Analysis, 94 papers in Computational Theory and Mathematics and 20 papers in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design on the topics of Cleft Lip and Palate Research (81 papers), Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms (60 papers), Global Health and Surgery (46 papers), Optimization and Search Problems (33 papers), Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments (32 papers), Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research (29 papers), Optimization and Packing Problems (27 papers) and Advanced Graph Theory Research (25 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (958 citations), Numerical Analysis (469 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (1.2k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (771 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (306 citations). Authors at Operation PAR collaborate with scholars in United States, France and Switzerland and have published in prestigious journals including RAIRO - Operations Research, The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine and World Journal of Surgery. Some of Operation PAR's most productive authors include B. Martinet, Gerold Stucki, Jacques Carlier, William P. Magee, Ahmed Yousuf Saber, Michael L. Dennis, Frank M. Tims, Jerome Bickenbach, Nancy L. Hamilton and Guy Diamond.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact