New York Botanical Garden

121.3k citations
3.9k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

New York Botanical Garden

3.4k papers receiving 105.7k citations

Peers

New York Botanical Garden
Comparison fields: 5 of 237
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 49.5k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 16.7k
  • Plant Science 44.8k
  • Ecological Modeling 4.1k
  • Ecology 18.5k
Replace SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry with:
SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry United States
Smithsonian Environmental Research Center United States
The Nature Conservancy United States
Beltsville Agricultural Research Center United States
Canadian Forest Service Canada
New York State College of Agriculture & Life Sciences United States
Goodwin College United States
Natural Resources Conservation Service United States
Marine Biological Laboratory United States
Wildlife Conservation Society United States
New York Botanical Garden relative to SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry United States SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at New York Botanical Garden

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at New York Botanical Garden. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at New York Botanical Garden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites New York Botanical Garden more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at New York Botanical Garden

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with New York Botanical Garden at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with New York Botanical Garden at the time of their publication.

About New York Botanical Garden

In recent decades, authors affiliated with New York Botanical Garden have published 3.9k papers, which have received a total of 121.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 2.3k papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 1.8k papers in Plant Science, 355 papers in Cell Biology, 241 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 74 papers in Ecological Modeling on the topics of Plant Diversity and Evolution (1.2k papers), Plant and animal studies (946 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (565 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (530 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (460 papers), Fern and Epiphyte Biology (414 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (393 papers) and Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (352 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (49.5k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (16.7k citations), Plant Science (44.8k citations), Ecological Modeling (4.1k citations) and Ecology (18.5k citations). Authors at New York Botanical Garden collaborate with scholars in United States, Brazil and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Mycologia, The Bryologist, American Journal of Botany, Taxon and Phytotaxa. Some of New York Botanical Garden's most productive authors include Gene E. Likens, Ghillean Tolmie Prance, Steward T. A. Pickett, Dennis Wm. Stevenson, Robert G. Wetzel, Michael L. Pace, Michael J. Balick, Damon P. Little, James L. Luteyn and Andrew Henderson.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact