Natural Resources Defense Council
Impact in
-
- Climate Change and Health Impacts
- Air Quality and Health Impacts
- Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
- Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
-
- Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
Papers in
-
- Climate Change and Health Impacts 40
- Air Quality and Health Impacts 20
- Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals 19
- Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact 15
- Top scholars
- Daniel A. LashofDilip R. AhujaGina M SolomonKim KnowltonMiriam Rotkin-EllmanKatherine E. PelchAnna ReadeCarol F. Kwiatkowski
- Journals
- Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (47 papers)Environmental Health Perspectives (21 papers)Environment Science and Policy for Sustainable Development (17 papers)Science (14 papers)The Electricity Journal (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Natural Resources Defense Council
309 papers receiving 12.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 214
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 4.2k
- Environmental Chemistry 1.2k
- Global and Planetary Change 2.3k
- Pollution 1.0k
- Environmental Engineering 1.2k
Countries citing scholars working at Natural Resources Defense Council
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Natural Resources Defense Council. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Natural Resources Defense Council with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natural Resources Defense Council more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Natural Resources Defense Council
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Natural Resources Defense Council at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Natural Resources Defense Council at the time of their publication.
About Natural Resources Defense Council
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Natural Resources Defense Council have published 390 papers, which have received a total of 13.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 84 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, 3 papers in Chemical Health and Safety, 46 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 18 papers in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality and 46 papers in Political Science and International Relations on the topics of Nuclear Issues and Defense (40 papers), Climate Change and Health Impacts (40 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (20 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (19 papers), Climate Change Policy and Economics (15 papers), Nuclear and radioactivity studies (15 papers), Marine animal studies overview (15 papers) and Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (15 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (4.2k citations), Environmental Chemistry (1.2k citations), Global and Planetary Change (2.3k citations), Pollution (1.0k citations) and Environmental Engineering (1.2k citations). Authors at Natural Resources Defense Council collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Environmental Health Perspectives, Environment Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, Science and The Electricity Journal. Some of Natural Resources Defense Council's most productive authors include Daniel A. Lashof, Dilip R. Ahuja, Gina M Solomon, Kim Knowlton, Miriam Rotkin-Ellman, Katherine E. Pelch, Anna Reade, Carol F. Kwiatkowski, Jennifer Beth Sass and Diane E. Bailey.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.