National Nuclear Laboratory

39.3k citations
1.9k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

National Nuclear Laboratory

1.8k papers receiving 38.1k citations

Peers

National Nuclear Laboratory
Comparison fields: 5 of 229
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 11.9k
  • Radiation 5.0k
  • Inorganic Chemistry 6.5k
  • Metals and Alloys 1.1k
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 2.1k
Replace Atomic Weapons Establishment with:
Atomic Weapons Establishment United Kingdom
Ricardo AEA (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
CEA Paris-Saclay - Etablissement de Saclay France
Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique et des Technologies Associées France
Campus France France
Nuclear Research and Consultancy Group Netherlands
Institut Rayonnement-Matière de Saclay France
Saint-Gobain (France) France
Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire de Caen France
Joint Research Center Belgium
National Nuclear Laboratory relative to Atomic Weapons Establishment United Kingdom Atomic Weapons Establishment's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Atomic Weapons Establishment · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at National Nuclear Laboratory

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Nuclear Laboratory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Nuclear Laboratory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Nuclear Laboratory more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at National Nuclear Laboratory

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Nuclear Laboratory at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Nuclear Laboratory at the time of their publication.

About National Nuclear Laboratory

In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Nuclear Laboratory have published 1.9k papers, which have received a total of 39.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 296 papers in Radiation, 429 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 75 papers in Metals and Alloys, 337 papers in Inorganic Chemistry and 641 papers in Materials Chemistry on the topics of Nuclear physics research studies (325 papers), Radioactive element chemistry and processing (318 papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (315 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (223 papers), Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (167 papers), Nuclear materials and radiation effects (147 papers), Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies (121 papers) and Nuclear and radioactivity studies (119 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nuclear and High Energy Physics (11.9k citations), Radiation (5.0k citations), Inorganic Chemistry (6.5k citations), Metals and Alloys (1.1k citations) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (2.1k citations). Authors at National Nuclear Laboratory collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Nuclear Physics A, Journal of Nuclear Materials, Physics Letters B, Progress in Nuclear Energy and Nuclear Physics B. Some of National Nuclear Laboratory's most productive authors include M.G. Adamson, A.R. Bodmer, P. E. Hodgson, D. H. Wilkinson, J.R. Rook, Robin J. Taylor, F. A. Brieva, Helen Thompson, J.M. Hyde and Douglas W. Wilmore.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact