KwaZulu-Natal Museum

6.9k citations
486 papers ·

Impact in

  • Archeology top 0.5%
    • Archaeology and Rock Art Studies
  • Paleontology top 10%
    • Archaeology and ancient environmental studies

Papers in

KwaZulu-Natal Museum

461 papers receiving 6.8k citations

Peers

KwaZulu-Natal Museum
Comparison fields: 5 of 150
  • Archeology 1.5k
  • Paleontology 1.8k
  • Anthropology 1.9k
  • Insect Science 1.5k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 2.0k
Replace Ditsong National Museum of Natural History with:
Ditsong National Museum of Natural History South Africa
Kimberley Hospital South Africa
South African Association for Marine Biological Research South Africa
National Zoological Gardens of South Africa South Africa
Endangered Wildlife Trust South Africa
De Beers (South Africa) South Africa
Bayworld South Africa
Bayworld Centre for Research and Education South Africa
University of Toliara Madagascar
Association Vahatra Madagascar
KwaZulu-Natal Museum relative to Ditsong National Museum of Natural History South Africa Ditsong National Museum of Natural History's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.3×
Ditsong National Museum of Natural History · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at KwaZulu-Natal Museum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at KwaZulu-Natal Museum. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at KwaZulu-Natal Museum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites KwaZulu-Natal Museum more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at KwaZulu-Natal Museum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with KwaZulu-Natal Museum at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with KwaZulu-Natal Museum at the time of their publication.

About KwaZulu-Natal Museum

In recent decades, authors affiliated with KwaZulu-Natal Museum have published 486 papers, which have received a total of 6.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 97 papers in Archeology, 226 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 142 papers in Insect Science, 83 papers in Paleontology and 85 papers in Anthropology on the topics of Diptera species taxonomy and behavior (130 papers), Archaeology and Rock Art Studies (96 papers), Insect behavior and control techniques (76 papers), Hymenoptera taxonomy and phylogeny (71 papers), Marine Biology and Ecology Research (68 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (63 papers), Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (63 papers) and Mollusks and Parasites Studies (51 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Archeology (1.5k citations), Paleontology (1.8k citations), Anthropology (1.9k citations), Insect Science (1.5k citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (2.0k citations). Authors at KwaZulu-Natal Museum collaborate with scholars in South Africa, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Southern African humanities, African Invertebrates, Zootaxa, ZooKeys and Azania Archaeological Research in Africa. Some of KwaZulu-Natal Museum's most productive authors include Marlize Lombard, Brian R. Stuckenberg, Tim Maggs, David Guy Herbert, Aron David Mazel, Gavin Whitelaw, R.N. Kilburn, R. F. Lawrence, Jason G.H. Londt and Michelle Hamer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact