National Law University, Delhi
Impact in
- Law top 10%
- Legal Studies and Policies
-
- Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
Papers in
- Law 69
- Law in Society and Culture 20
- Judicial and Constitutional Studies 15
- Legal Education and Practice Innovations 13
-
- Artificial Intelligence in Law 14
- South Asian Studies and Conflicts 12
- Top scholars
- Marcelo Corrales CompagnucciMark FenwickRachel CalamRoger Jon DesmondJerome L. SingerDorothy G. SingerAbhishek NegiHelena Haapio
- Journals
- The American Journal of Comparative Law (6 papers)DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology (3 papers)Indian Journal of Gender Studies (3 papers)Benchmarking An International Journal (2 papers)Journal of Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- IndiaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
National Law University, Delhi
226 papers receiving 948 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 160
- Law 146
- Political Science and International Relations 188
- Gender Studies 67
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 54
- Communication 42
Countries citing scholars working at National Law University, Delhi
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Law University, Delhi. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Law University, Delhi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Law University, Delhi more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at National Law University, Delhi
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Law University, Delhi at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Law University, Delhi at the time of their publication.
About National Law University, Delhi
In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Law University, Delhi have published 369 papers, which have received a total of 1.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 69 papers in Law, 98 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 30 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, 37 papers in Strategy and Management and 17 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation on the topics of Law in Society and Culture (20 papers), International Arbitration and Investment Law (17 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (15 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (14 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Law (14 papers), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (13 papers), South Asian Studies and Conflicts (12 papers) and Intellectual Property and Patents (12 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Law (146 citations), Political Science and International Relations (188 citations), Gender Studies (67 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (54 citations) and Communication (42 citations). Authors at National Law University, Delhi collaborate with scholars in India, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including The American Journal of Comparative Law, DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, Indian Journal of Gender Studies, Benchmarking An International Journal and Journal of Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues. Some of National Law University, Delhi's most productive authors include Marcelo Corrales Compagnucci, Mark Fenwick, Rachel Calam, Roger Jon Desmond, Jerome L. Singer, Dorothy G. Singer, Abhishek Negi, Helena Haapio, Manu Goswami and Gary L. Francione.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.