National Library of Israel

20.7k citations
1.1k papers ·

Impact in

  • Paleontology top 10%
    • Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Archeology top 5%
    • Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies

Papers in

    • Archaeology and ancient environmental studies 55
    • Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies 55

National Library of Israel

975 papers receiving 19.5k citations

Peers

National Library of Israel
Comparison fields: 5 of 242
  • Paleontology 1.9k
  • Archeology 275
  • Anthropology 1.7k
  • Archeology 1.5k
  • Safety Research 962
Replace Israel Antiquities Authority with:
Israel Antiquities Authority Israel
Ruppin Academic Center Israel
Alzheimer's Association of Israel Israel
New Bulgarian University Bulgaria
Institute of Ethnology Hungary
Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts Croatia
Ministry of Social Affairs and Social Services Israel
The Technological College of Beer Sheva Israel
V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University Ukraine
Polish Academy of Learning Poland
National Library of Israel relative to Israel Antiquities Authority Israel Israel Antiquities Authority's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×22.4×
Israel Antiquities Authority · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at National Library of Israel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Library of Israel. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Library of Israel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Library of Israel more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at National Library of Israel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Library of Israel at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Library of Israel at the time of their publication.

About National Library of Israel

In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Library of Israel have published 1.1k papers, which have received a total of 20.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 110 papers in Paleontology, 11 papers in Archeology, 85 papers in Archeology, 61 papers in Safety Research and 70 papers in Anthropology on the topics of Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (68 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (63 papers), Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods (58 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (55 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (55 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (41 papers), Identification and Quantification in Food (41 papers) and Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (39 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Paleontology (1.9k citations), Archeology (275 citations), Anthropology (1.7k citations), Archeology (1.5k citations) and Safety Research (962 citations). Authors at National Library of Israel collaborate with scholars in Israel, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Forensic Sciences, Accreditation and Quality Assurance, Forensic Science International, Scientific Reports and Solar Energy. Some of National Library of Israel's most productive authors include Hervé Seligmann, H. Tabor, Eitan Elaad, Ilya Kuselman, Liora Kolska Horwitz, Joseph Almog, Jacques Demongeot, Nathalie Q. Balaban, Rivka Rabinovich and Gershon Ben‐Shakhar.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact