Netherlands eScience Center

12.5k citations
457 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Netherlands eScience Center

398 papers receiving 11.2k citations

Peers

Netherlands eScience Center
Comparison fields: 5 of 229
  • Information Systems and Management 521
  • Global and Planetary Change 1.5k
  • Atmospheric Science 1.1k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 744
  • Instrumentation 164
Replace Swisscom (Switzerland) with:
Swisscom (Switzerland) Switzerland
Institute for Applied Systems Technology Bremen Germany
Leibniz Supercomputing Centre Germany
Capgemini (Netherlands) Netherlands
Lancaster City Council United Kingdom
Ordnance Survey United Kingdom
Centre for Advanced Study Norway
Consorzio Pisa Ricerche Italy
Novay Netherlands
Digital Catapult United Kingdom
Netherlands eScience Center relative to Swisscom (Switzerland) Switzerland Swisscom (Switzerland)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.0×
Swisscom (Switzerland) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Netherlands eScience Center

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Netherlands eScience Center. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Netherlands eScience Center with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Netherlands eScience Center more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Netherlands eScience Center

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Netherlands eScience Center at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Netherlands eScience Center at the time of their publication.

About Netherlands eScience Center

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Netherlands eScience Center have published 457 papers, which have received a total of 12.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 41 papers in Information Systems and Management, 25 papers in Hardware and Architecture, 58 papers in Atmospheric Science, 62 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 11 papers in Ecological Modeling on the topics of Climate variability and models (45 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (41 papers), Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (39 papers), Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (32 papers), Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (25 papers), Advanced Data Storage Technologies (23 papers), Radio Astronomy Observations and Technology (21 papers) and Research Data Management Practices (18 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Information Systems and Management (521 citations), Global and Planetary Change (1.5k citations), Atmospheric Science (1.1k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (744 citations) and Instrumentation (164 citations). Authors at Netherlands eScience Center collaborate with scholars in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Geoscientific model development, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Journal of Climate. Some of Netherlands eScience Center's most productive authors include Alex de Vries, Vincent T. van Hees, Sèverine Sabia, Florian G. Huber, Lars Ridder, Justin J. J. van der Hooft, Ben van Werkhoven, Alex V. Rowlands, Jairo Hidalgo Migueles and Wilco Hazeleger.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact